ReadMe!!!!

Viewing posts for the category Hypergeometrical Universe

Brief Review on How We Know What We Think We Know

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 9 months ago
Comments #3 Brief Review of How We Know What We Think We Know

I said...

How do we know what we think we know?
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Without the benefit of seeing the skinny fourth spatial dimension, we couldn't really measure those 4D volumes and very small angles, so we concocted the concept of Mass (the 3D projection of a 4D Volume).

If you don't know that you are traveling radially at the speed of light, your 3D observations and body of knowledge will have to be adjusted to consider lightspeed to be the limiting speed on the 3D sliver of Universe you live. That entails stretching proper time, contracting space, etc.

I don't know who else did it, but I certainly did notice that Lorentz transformations is equivalent to a rotation by an imaginary angle and that time is imaginary in Physics.

The point is that by discovering Lorentz transformations we postponed another 100 years the discovery that we are all in motion at the speed of light. Were I am certainly being optmistic in believing people will eventually discover my work..:)

I appologize for being loud and sometimes outrageous or at least defiant in my corner of the internet... It is very, very quiet here and sometimes one has to scream to check to see if anyone is listening...:)

Next, I've just copied a prior blog - sanitized from some of my sense of isolation - in preparation for better blogs about the Hyperons... The Hyperon work was done last year end, during my vacation....I was pleasantly distracted and had only some of my attention on the problem.... so they might be perfect or not... I didn't reconsider the assignment problem to check for mistakes... I welcome any suggestions, corrections..

In my paper, I expressed Newton's equation as:

read more / 0 comments

Comment #2 on the Silver Surfer

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 9 months ago
Comments #2 on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Anonymous said...

Ok, I see it. I guess it explains the lateral motion. But what about the radial? If one was to take a "surfer" analogy literally, one would have to assume a presence of a force perpendicular to the plain of "surfing". I.e. the only reason a real surfer can move forward is because of a gravity pulling him perpendicular to the surface of water, water resisting it, and a moving wave. So, if we live on the edge of a 4D shockwave, then there should be some force pulling us in the fifth dimension, shouldn't there?

---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------

First of ALL, let me thank you for asking me such meaningful and thoughtful questions.

This is a wonderful question, Anonymous...

I prayed everyday for such an event, and finally got my prayers answered ...:) He sent me a real Surfer (I mean, a Real Physicist...:)

First, let me remind you that the force on a Surfer is also trying to reach equilibrium or relaxation and that althought there is a Force and there is motion, if one disregards friction between the surfboard and the water and changes in height, there isn't work been done. The Force is just a boundary force or virtual force not unlike the force the ground exerts on us. The same is valid for the hypersuperficial force :).

First I will give you the short answer :

Radial (and lateral) propagation is driven by restoring metric forces (I calculated the 4D space deformation spring constant in my Grand Unification Paper). One can surf a transversal sea wave (where Gravity is the restoring force) or a shock wave (longitudinal wave) from a Supernova explosion (pressure being the restoring force). There are dissipation, acceleration and masses in these analogies, but in my theory there are only dilatons (traveling metric modulations) and dilators (coherences between 4D stationary deformational states). NO accelerations or masses.

read more / 0 comments

Comments #1 on The Silver Surfer

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 10 months ago
Comments on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Anonymous said...

Say, there are two observers A and B separated by distance X. The observer A starts motion in direction of B with such an impulse, that by the time he reaches B, his velocity will match the Hubble velocity. What will the observer B see? Will the A continue his motion? Will he slow down and stop?
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
To answer this question the first thing to notice is that one can see A and B on both cross-sections shown above. We will use just the left panel RXYZ cross-section to answer this question.
Let's first check the initial condition where the Fabric of Space is relaxed on both A and B positions, reminding that the Fabric of Space is the wave we ride - where the 3D space and all dilators (matter) are located.

At first sight you might think that the objects on positions A and B are at rest with respect to one another. This would be the case if the 3D Hypersurface were not expanding at the speed of light. In reality they are traveling away from each other at their Hubble velocity. Be their distance X, then they are running away from each other by X/R*c

This can be easily derived if one considers that the radial expansion takes place at the speed of light and the geometry of the figure.

That is why one can only see thing up to one radian in each direction.
The first thing to notice is that it is not clear how to measure the local deformation of the Fabric of Space. This topology (hyperspherical expanding 3D Universe) is connected to the 4D Big Bang proposed in the Cosmogenesis paper.
Under that assumption (Big Bang = 4D explosion), the average velocity on any region of the 3D space is the Hubble velocity, that is, farther regions contains celestial objects that on average run away from us at the Hubble speed. What one can distinguish from one region to another is the width of that distribution. When most of the interactions had taken place a long time ago, the distribution will be sharper. A sharper distribution of receding velocites means that the objects are close to their Fabric of Space relaxed positions.
The comment requires that object A, under the action of an impulse, to reach its Hubble velocity at position B. Velocity is a tilt in the local Fabric of Space and that tilt should make the local normal to be parallel to the Fabric of Space normal at position B. The diagram that would reflect that condition would be the following:


For the distance between the objects to diminish, the tilt (velocity) has to be larger than the Hubble tilt (velocity) between the two objects, thus the proposed experiment doesn't make sense and that is the reason for the paradox.

read more / 0 comments

Encounters of the 4th Kind....:)

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 10 months ago

read more / 0 comments

Going NOWHERE Fast

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 10 months ago



Going NOWHERE Fast...:)


Well, well....:) Now you can stretch your brain a little more and understand what Science is grasping at straws to explain... The Supersolidity Effect..

Not unlike in the case of liquid helium 4 superfluidity, the thought constraints due to the Equivalence Principle between Gravitational and Inertial Masses created the conjecture of solid superfluidity..

This is a much simpler problem if one understands quantum mechanics, motion (accordingly to my model) and simple topology.

Supersolidity is the idea that a solid can freely pass through itself ??? whatever that means.
The experiment that gave rise to such a contrived idea is the following:
a) Pick up a bucket of solid helium 4
b) Rotate it around its axis and cool it down further.
c) At a given temperature, the bucket of Helium 4 suddenly starts rotating faster....:)

The simple-minded explanation is that somehow the core of the solid helium rotating volume simply stopped rotating while the exterior crust started rotating faster to conserve angular momentum.

This is an idea with very large holes..>:)
a) First, for the middle core to stop rotating, it has to receive a torque..>:) supposelly the same torque that makes the exterior crust to rotate faster afterwards... THE OBVIOUS QUESTION IS WHY??????

WHY WOULD SUCH TORQUE BE CREATED?

I am not going to waste time thinking along those lines...

Quantum Mechanics provides a much simpler although extremely surprising (for the people who doesn't know the Hypergeoemtrical Universe theory) answer.

As the temperature goes down, the wavefunction defining each atom in the spinning bucket gets wider. This means that any observable quantity has to be the result of averaging this wavefunction with the observable operator. In the case of velocity, the operator is the inclination of the local space. I will not try to draw a Mexican Hat or a twisted Mexican Hat...:) it is too difficult...

I can tell you in simple words... As the wavefunction gets wider, it starts probing positions on the other side of the center of rotation, that is, it probes motion with components both positve and negative. This averages the state of motion to a lower effective velocity. As the temperature goes down further the masses positioned close to the center of rotation changes their state of motion into no motion and that state doesn't change with an increase in angular velocity.

This means at that lower temperature, the boson solid loses moment of inertia but doesn't lose gravitational mass. It also doesn't lose inertial mass for linear motion!!!!!

This decouples Gravitational Mass from Inertial Mass and Linear Inertial Mass from Rotational Inertial Mass...:) QED.

If you now ask me what would happen in a bosonic celestial body that is close to zero kelvin... I would say it would rotate at the speed of light...:) No ifs or buts...

If you read my theory you will realize that there are other ways to reach things deemed impossible by our Science....:)

Rebel against that... There is a lot to lose if one stops dreaming, but to dream that things are in a way they are not is not conducive to a great human adventure...

Cheers,

MP

read more / 0 comments

Recent Posts

Archive

2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006

Categories

Authors

Feeds

RSS / Atom