ReadMe!!!!

Viewing posts by M P

Great Balls of Fire...:)

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years ago

Great Balls of Fire

Holy Cow...:)

I had a nice discussion with Kiril Chucanov in the last few days...:) As usual, from friction comes light...:)

The discussion wasn't a great sucess... I wasn't able to ascertain if Kiril Chucanov was onto something or just blowing smoke...

He places videos of Balls of Fire in microwave ovens..:) and claimed a 5MW Power Plant that creates energy from nothing.

I wanted him to say - "Well, I injected 100 Joules and derived 1000 Joules.. or I ran the power plant for 1 hour and extracted 18000 mega Joules... " This is the heat created in just one hour by a 5MW power plant..in fact, it can be even higher if the 5MW is an output power specification as opposed to just a simple measure of available power..

As you might now, to dissipate 18000 megaJoules is no small feat... I suppose the experimental setup is not linked to the power grid and that energy is extracted as heat only...This situation poses significant difficulty since one cannot dump legally large quantities of scalding water into the sink...

I would expect that a working power generator based upon such discovery would only be created after clear evidence of its validity, valid patents, etc.

Had he said that, I would take his word for it... That would be a meaningful statement... That amount of power would have to come out as heat and it would be trivial to measure the coolant temperature change during energy extraction...:) it would generate about 12 hundred liters or 260 gallons of boiling water per second...

Nobody would have any doubt about Free Energy if he had just said what I wrote above...

Any questions could only be laid on his credibility... not on experimental error.

Now we will never know...:)
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
I followed up and found this in the New Scientist:

Lightning balls created in the lab -10 January 2007
From New Scientist Print Edition. Hazel Muir

Kiril Chucanov

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 1 month ago

Galilean Electrodynamics

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 1 month ago

It may or may not be attributable to Galileo.

Please, read the blog Galileo Galilei Biggest Blunder . This blog is just next to Newton's Biggest Blunder...:)

Please, let me know your comments.

Cheers,

MP

A Story Full of Sound and Fury..:)

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 1 month ago

Professor Smulsky

Posted by: M P in Hypergeometrical Universe 17 years, 1 month ago

Dear MP,

Thank you for your proposition to feel free to comment.

I. I begin from your words: "The physics is invisible to your eyes and instruments. It can only be seem with the eyes of the mind...", which pertain to the contemporary Physics. Such Physics is false science. It gives imaginary worlds instead the real one. I propose you to read my paper "Smulsky J.J. Conceptual Error in Contemporary Science // Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance. 13th Annual Conference 3-7 April 2006 at the University of Tulsa, OK, USA. Vol.3, No. 2. Published Space Time Analyses, Ltd. Arlington, MA,USA.- 2007. - Pp. 277-281." (http://hypergeo.s3.amazonaws.com/static/media/uploads/blog/CnErCS2.pdf)

II. Hypergeometrical Universe Theory, Grand Unification, inflation and other theories are based on the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). I send you my paper "Gravitation, field and rotation of Mercury perihelion", from which you will find that it is downfall of General Theory of Relativity. GTR can be forgotten and can be thrown out. Below I give some information about my paper:

Abstract: The basic components of a problem of rotation of Mercury perihelion are considered. It is shown, that offered by Paul Gerber the finite speed of gravity propagation has not substantiation. It is established, that with influence under the Newton law of gravity the perihelion in motionless reference system turns on 529.9" per one century, but on the data of observation it turns on 582.3" per one century. Early the rotation of the Sun on a movement of planets was not taken into account. The compound model of rotation of the Sun is offered which allows taking into account this influence. In view of rotation of the Sun the Newton law of gravity defines all size of perihelion rotation and defines all features of the planets movement.

Conclusions
1. The offered in 1898 by Paul Gerber the mechanism of finite speed of gravitation is
speculative and has no a substantiation.

• Page 30 of 60
• ←
• 25
• 26
• 27
• 28
• 29
• 30
• 31
• 32
• 33
• 34
• →