A. Chicken Thieves ..:)
August 29, 2007
Archive: 2007/8
Several blogs associated with the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory
Spanking Science - The Review ...:)
August 28, 2007
This is a cynical and hopefully humorous analysis of how could such review come about. Of course, I hope to be wrong and I sent an email requesting clarification. In the event of a clear response, it will be clear to me that I didn't have any good reason to be so cynical...:)I will keep you posted on my communications with Los Alamos.____________________________________________I tried to imagine how such a vacuous review could have been written and started envisioning the events as follow:
Spanking Science - Inappropriate Submissions...:)
August 28, 2007
Review of the "Review"Let me make it very clear. I tried to present a non-orthodox view of science and that was censored without an appropriate justification. Just in case you don't realized it, the argument below is a cynical or ironical consideration.It is cynical because a conclusion of conspiracy//collusion can be easily derived from the obstacles Los Alamos (i.e. the moderators) place on the intellectual production of the people who doesn't review their grants or papers, see them in conferences etc...- the unafilliated people.I have a hard time stating what I am stating, since I know crackpot literature... Half-backed ideas and I don't like them... On the other hand, it takes me just a few minutes to find some flaw in their argument and move on. So there is no need for censorship. Categorizing is enough. I have to do the same for crackpot ideas from affiliated people (university affiliated people).A simple solution to the problem can be easily achieved by providing a subsection on the site for speculative science by non-afilliated people. One can envision the same kind of reviewing protocol as in Philica.com and a larger and searcheable abstract. If necessary one might limit the volume of contribution to some arbitrary size, such that prolific people concentrate on their best ideas... but that should be larger than a large manuscript... Sometimes people have something interesting to say which requires lots of explanations...:)This would eliminate the need for the horrendous barrier of finding an endorser. I tried to contact many potential endorsers and they certainly didn't give me the time of the day. This in itself is a tremendous censorship of new ideas.Since I've just provided a simple solution to the problem, censorship has to be the goal of the moderators...Q.E.D.In addition, the moderation process is not described in the submission protocol. I don't really understand how one can substitute the discussions I had with my endorser - who is a particle physicist and who published on the High Energy Physics section in the past - by a moderator's glance of my work.Irony and Cynicism Below...:)
A Little Bit about Censorship
August 28, 2007
Censorship by Philip Helbig, sci.physics.research co-moderator
August 28, 2007
CENSORSHIPI guess I will have to receive the Nobel Prize before I can post anything in the sci.physics.research Yahoo Group.One can always say that scientists are cold and calculating, but you can say that at least some of them are very, very, very sensitive...:)These small subset need to protect their sensibilities from any challenges to what they believe is the correct interpretation of reality.These people are giving Science a bad name... It is a shame... Newton, Einstein and any other scientist with a revolutionary idea would be blocked in the United States of America scientific environment controlled by Dr. Ginsparg (Los Alamos-Cornell arquives) or this Dr. Helbig. It is a shame... if I didn't mention that before...:)It is suprising that, Dr. Helbig would consider my theory speculative and at the same time, they would publish crap about creating Universes in laboratory or inter-brane interactions etc... It boggles my mind..>:)From this interaction you can imagine the odds of me publishing anything along the lines of what I wrote in this blog...:) Every idea I created here and tried to convey to academia were always blocked without any justification by the likes of Dr. Helbig or Paul Ginsparg- the de facto owner of the Los Alamos Arquives.Please follow the links and look for censorship at the Los Alamos Arquives (paid by your tax dollars) by Paul Ginsparg. Here is the linkhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=los+alamos+arquives+censorshipI will make another attempt to publish my little Grand Unification Theory at the Los Alamos Arquives this week.Please write to the Dean of the Cornell University requesting that pressure be exerted on Dr. Ginsparg to provide at least an explanation why he would just deem my theory INAPPROPRIATE...:)ProvostCarolyn (Biddy) Martincam18@cornell.edu(607) 255-2364Or in a more tactful manner, please write or call Dr. Ginsparg and tell him about the relevance of my theory and that it deserves a few bits of storage in one of the Los Alamos servers..>:) It is not too much to ask...:)Please do the same for Dr. Helbig, the co-moderator of the sci.physics.research Yahoo Group. Here is his email:Phillip Helbig helbig@astro.multivax.deCheers,MP--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip Helbig X-Ray..:)<helbig@astro.multivax.de>to meshow details4:53 am (3 hours ago)Unfortunately, the article you posted to sci.physics.research isinappropriate for the newsgroup because it is too speculative.Please note that, since the article was posted to a moderated group andwas not approved, it will not appear in ANY newsgroup. If you want topost it to any unmoderated newsgroup, you must post it again, avoidingany moderated newsgroups.Keep in mind that posts are randomly distributed to one of the ACTIVEco-moderators. At any given time, one or more of these can be inactive.If, rather than resubmitting a post in the normal way, you email amoderator directly, it might arrive while he is inactive, causing anunnecessary delay.Sincerely,Phillip Helbig, sci.physics.research co-moderator------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Below is my threatening posting:I finished blogging the assignment for all the Hyperon Family using only a single dilaton coherence - the fundamental dilator - and the three Neutrino subcoherences (ElectronNeutrino, MuonNeutrino and TauNeutrino).This comprises the Hypergeometrical Standard Model and offers a simple and clear alternative to the Standard Model. The Hypergeometrical Universe provides Grand Unification.The site is http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post them to the blog. Any intelligent comment, suggestion or correction would be valued and invaluable.Best,MP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------and my replyDear Dr. Heilbig,I would appreciate if you were to give any thought to the fact that I created a model in which I replicate both Electromagnetism, Gravitation from a simple equation, modeled all the Hyperons using a simple paradigm of metric deformation coherences (fundamental dilator) and was able to calculate their masses in a simple manner and from first principles.That should be worth a simple two paragraphs posting.If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me.Thanks,MP
Inappropriate Submissions...Communications
August 28, 2007
Maybe I was in bad mood after all...:) What can I say.... I am just human...:) My last blog was a quasi-coherent rant (to be kind to myself) and to a high degree it did not provide a clear view of what really happened and what I think. I will organize the argument properly here.I decided that the last blog was way tooooo melodramatic and decided to divide it into three. This one will keep the Los Alamos ArXives communications...
Hypergeometrical Universe Censorship
August 28, 2007
Hypergeometrical Universe CensorshipSometimes you have to get over your troubles and see things in a clearer manner.I realized that the inherent difficulties in the introduction to a new physics to old scientist were distracting in my old blog.I decided to move those blogs here and stop crying like a baby...:)Here they are, just for sake of keeping the historical perspective correct.I don't know if I am proud of so much complaining or ashamed...:)What can I say, I am just human after all..Cheers,MP
Questions
August 26, 2007
Questions:I received this question about WHAT...:)Since we all can learn from WHAT as well as WHY, here is the question and the answer:It will be nice if you can explain WHAT you show is new, which was not shown or proven for Hyperons in conventional quark models (QCD) ?I like your rotated diagramsThe WHAT is everything....This is a total departure from existing Physics from the point defined by Newton's Four Natural Laws.
To Serve Humans
August 25, 2007
To Serve Humans
The Grand Finalle- The Omegas
August 25, 2007
The Grand Finalle- The Omegas
The Smoking Xis
August 25, 2007
THE SMOKING XISComing down the pipe are the XIS. Below are the assignment for XI Zero and XI Minus: which decays into Lambda Zero plus a Pion Minus...:) (remember that Lambda Zero is just another spin configuration of Delta Zero)
The Kaons
August 25, 2007
The KaonsThe Kaons is a detour. Up to know we only analysed particles that contained Electron-Neutrinos (Electron-Proton-Electron transmutation transitions) or Muon-Neutrinos (Electron-Positron-Electron transmutation transitions)The Kaons will involve the last known neutrino: The Tau Neutrino.Let's start with the Kaon Minus assignment:which decays into a Pion Minus plus a Pion Zero.
The Twisted Deltas - The Puzzling Delta Plus Plus
August 25, 2007
The Twisted Deltas - The Great Delta Zero
August 25, 2007
The Twisted Deltas - The Great Delta ZeroThe next Delta will blow your mind away...:) it becomes more complex as time goes by...:) I can see your Brain gears moving already...:)Delta Zero is a step above in terms of complexity both structurally and in terms of the dissociation dynamics.Below is its assignment. The assignment is based upon the decay pathway: DeltaZero -> Neutron plus PionZeroA simple rearrangement of red and blue lines yields the diagram below:The other decay pathways is more complex: DeltaZero -> Proton + Pion Minus.The first step in this pathway is shown below:This shows the Proton detachment but it is still unclear how the other moiety can correspond to a Pion Minus...:) The first step in the simplification is to eliminate the Electron-Proton spin 1/2 followed by an Proton-Electron spin -1/2 transmutation, leaving the basic Pion Minus plus an electron and a positron extras.To understand the next decaying steps, one should think about these multichords in a multimeric fashion. This initial stage is pentameric. The state of the products can be understood from the diagram below:Notice the five concurrent multichords associated with this excited state Pion Minus. This means just after Proton detachments, one is left with a pentameric moiety. This means that there will be a positron and an electron with opposing spins facing each other in the 3D Universe. The metric displacement volumes associated with both adds up to zero and that means that there will be no loss of 3D Volume (3D Mass or Energy) if a Positron and its counterparty electron are eliminated from the multichord coherence. The resulting trimeric moiety is what we call Pion Minus and it is shown below:which is the same as :in our short hand representation.Remember that a multichord particle will have an extra degree of freedom (the 3D moment of inertia of the "nuclear" particle). It pseudo-rotate at a very specific angle at each de Broglie step of the Shock Wave Universe expansion.This extra degree of freedom permits the positron electron anihilation without change in the 3D Mass or energy.I hope you are having fun...:) Sigma Zero decays into Lambda Zero plus Gamma Ray, thus it should contain and extra electron-positron pair responsible by the Gamma Ray.
Pion Zero - Majorama Coherence
August 25, 2007
Pion Zero - Majorama CoherenceTheoreticians make a big fuss of Majorama particles....:) It turned out that their speculation was correct (within my model) and that Pion Zero is its own anti-Particle...:) It should be clear that one can rearrange the coherence such that the electrons go into the interior of the multichord coherence and that Electron-Proton-Electron is the same as Positron-AntiProton-Positro transmutation transition.
The Twisted Deltas - Delta Minus
August 23, 2007
The Twisted Deltas - Delta Plus
August 22, 2007
The Twisted Deltas - The Delta PlusYou haven't seen anything until you see the Twisted Deltas...:)The Deltas have spin 3/2...:) and are complex dimensional multichords. They are also big and difficult to blog. Blogger makes them too small to read, almost... Later I will post links to the full size pictures.The same diagrams will be in the updated Grand Unification paper as soon as I finish polishing it. The old version is on the papers section of this blog.Below is the Delta Plus....I should be self-evident that one can decompose it into a Neutron and a Pion Plus...:) Well, maybe you might need a little help here...Below is the Neutron plus Pion Plus decay products.Notice that one made use of the fact that a Electron-Proton-Electron is the same things as a Positron-AntiProton-Positron transmutation.Notice that the Delta Plus Dimensional Multichord contains exactly two Blue Transmultation Transitions (blue lines = electron-positron or positron-electron transmutations) and four Red Transmutations Transitions (red lines= electron-proton or proton-electron transmutations).
Hyperons - Review up to the Pion Family
August 20, 2007
Hyperon Review:Let's take a look on the Fundamental Dilator and their relatives - The Hyperons. The fundamental dilator is what we call a Proton or an Electron. Depending upon which phase is in phase with the Hyperspherical Lightspeed Expanding Universe one can have one or the other.Transmutation transions can connect dimensional chords (each dimensional chord expresses the four phases of the fundamental dilator) and change the character of the dilator. I was able to create a full replacement for the Standard Model that makes use of dimensional chords and simple transmutation transitions/ transmutation chords.Let take a look at the Fundamental Dilator once again.The Electron(Proton):The fundamental dilator is a 4D coherence between stationary states of deformation. The deformation of space is quantized, that is, can be represented as states in a 4D double potential well.The respective coherences for Electron and Proton are shown below: and for a Proton: Notice that the Proton and Electron coherences differ only by which is the initial (in phase) state in the coherence. The states associated with the Electron (0,-2/3,-1/3) and (0,-1/3,-2/3) differ not by "energy" since they have the same 3D volume (the Hpergeometrical Universe equivalent to Energy is the 3D projection of the 4D Volume) but by time. It takes time to rotate the dilator around (at the speed of light) and that introduces an extra phase delay on the Tunnelling Process with respect to the Spinning Process. Remember that all particles in the Universe are described in terms of combinations of this two fundamental dilators and that they have Spin Half, that is, they spin at half the speed of tunneling...:) A nice touch, I might say...:)
Faster than The Speed of Light Propagation
August 19, 2007
Faster than a Speeding Bullet
Linear and Hyperbolic Spaces
August 19, 2007
Hypergeometrical Covariance
August 19, 2007
Criticism and the Scientific Method
August 19, 2007
Criticism and the Scientific Method
Critique 2
August 19, 2007
Critique 1
August 19, 2007