HyperGeometrical Universe Theory

December 30, 2009

Verbum Significatium

Filed under: Verbum Significatium — admin @ 2:19 pm

Verbum Significatium

It is no Ancient Secret that I enjoyed reading Dan Brown’s Angels and Deamons. I rarely read fiction but I was smitten by the subject – a scientific plot within the surroundings of Castelo di Sant’Angelo Many of my previous blogs contain references to Illuminati…:) an humorous take on the Wisdom of the Ancients. I am not someone who believes in the Wisdom of the Ancients, although considering how simple my theory is, it wouldn’t surprise me if Ancient Wise people had a glimpse of it.

Knowledge doesn’t evolve in straight lines – over long periods of time. This statement looks odd if considered within our short-lived technological framework where new technologies are derived from previous ones. The statement becomes meaningful if one add a longer time frame. Our technology/science will develop in short straight lines with bottlenecks. At these instances, noise will take over until a breakthrough coming from nowhere will make itself felt.

This is where my theory fits in. To a high degree my theory could had been discovered by ancients. I mentioned in several postings similarities between my intermittently interacting Universe and Diana,
the Goddess-Huntress seeking knowledge in the forest of Silva.

The goddess Diana, the huntress, as a model for the searching human soul. In the Forest, his Diana sought out of tracks or traces, literally footprints, vestigia, of God’s divine light.

Plato is an ever inspiring Ancient Sage.

Plato asserts to this in the third book of the Laws, when he teaches that one should track down musical harmonies in the manner of experienced dogs.

If you replace dogs by detectors and musical harmonies by dilatons…:)

His description of the enlightenment process resonates with my experience, facing deeply rooted interests – some defenseable others unconfessable – in trying to bring about a new paradigm or view of the Universe.

Other abundantly mentioned wisdom (As Above as Below, As in Heaven so in Earth) were also mentioned:

Explained Trice Great Hermes Trimegistus’ hermetic philosophy on On the Sphaere One and On the Sphaere Two

In fact, it turned out to be more than pattern recognition. Closer reading of Giordano Bruno’s ideas about the Universe clearly indicates that he saw it according to the topology expressed by Hermes Trimegistus saying, and repeated by Saint Augustine and Nicholas de Kues :

“the center was everywhere and the circunference nowhere”

Of course, this is exactly what happens to the 3D Universe when understood through my theory. If you think, how could Hermes Trice Great (Trimegistus) come up with the Hypersperical Topology many millenia ago…:)

In my theory you are always at the center of your Universe…:) no matter where you are…:) The center is everywhere — the circunference is nowhere (since we are bound to the 3D lightspeed expanding hyperspherical Universe and cannot see anything perpendicular to it…

In fact, we can see the four-dimensional center of the Universe if we look far away in any direction…:) we can see it with the eye of the mind..:) that is, by understanding that far away in any direction maps directly to the center and thus maps the radius of the circumference…:)

Hidden in plain view as any true and deep wisdom…:)

Now lets see what new pieces of wisdom can be mapped to the Hypergeometrical Universe paradigm. The first that comes to mind is the Circumpunct…which has many meanings, being the most esoteric: the Rose

You might notice some similarities between the Rose and my Hypergeometrical Universe topology…:)

The Rosecrucian symbol is show below:

where you can see a Rose (the Circumpunct) overlaying a Crux. I am not saying that the Rosecrucians worship an long forgotten Universe topology but I am also not saying otherwise…:)

The Complete Rosecrucian symbol, long forgotten in the sands of time, is shown below:

.which contains one Rose for each of the six faces of the Crux.

Of course, when closed, the Complete Rosecrucian symbol represents the Circumpunct symmetry of the Universe, where in any direction, its cross-section is always a Circumpunct…:)

Below is a representation of the Cosmic Cube, representing the Hypergeometrical Universe Paradigm..:) and a 33rd degree Rosecrucian:

In addition to concatenate all knowledge of the Ancients with my theory, I was also able to recover a nice Riddle wrapped around a puzzle…:) from the Ancients …:)

Cheers, Happy New Year!

Comments (2)

December 19, 2009

Comment on Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Filed under: Comment on Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe — admin @ 9:43 am

Comment:

Hi MP, I am glad I´ve found your site and your thoughts about things. I have read some of your HU-paper and bits and pieces here and in your blog. I am impressed. Nr 1 reason I am writing is that I have also been thinking about a 4d expanding universe as a solution to understand/explain GR and “facts” like time, CMB and expansion. Well my ideas has been Macro/topographic and I have not been able to incorporate particles. When I realized that this idea has potential I´ve been looking around for a while on the net and in popular books and found nothing like this in the psysics community. And than I stumbelled over your blog when I tried to find information and thinking about the imagined higgs boson. I´m trying to understand your theory and the first question is: how exactly is your theory explaining gravity? Is the FS deformed by dilators like the Einsteinian curved space or is it that gravity is a part/consequence of the dilator interaction? Hope you understand what I mean.

Cheers/PS

Peter,

It is a pleasure to meet a like-minded reader…:) The idea of a lightspeed expanding 3D hyperspherical shockwave universe is unique and revolutionary. There isn’t anything in the literature for many reasons. First, the idea is daring and proposes lightspeed traveling which would have a knee-jerk reaction from anyone in academia, not to mention the sheer panic instilled in editors when faced with such proposal. A narrow and ignorant reading of Restrict Relativity would seem to contradict this idea. It just happens that every theory has a scope and the Restrict Relativity’s scope is a 4D spacetime. Within a 4D spacetime, proper time and proper space adjust themselves by definition to yield an universally observable constant velocity of light.

I mentioned in my blog that this is the result of a format choice for the equations of motion. There are many choices made by mankind which contributed to this. I mentioned in Newton’s Blunder that in introducing the concept of Force and mass to describe acceleration, he missed a great opportunity to create a purely geometrical theory of the Universe. I recast Newton’s laws in such a way as to eliminate mass and force and created such a theory..:)

Motion is defined by the Quantum Lagrangian Principle, which is a simple physical principle that can be tested in any body of water and wave producing mechanical dilators. Had I the time and resources, I would do it myself, but this is an easy Gedanken Experiment and I leave the simple demonstration to the readers and future generations.

The Quantun Lagrangian Principle states that dilator (dilaton or metric wave generators) always move in such a way as never do any work…:) they are awfully lazy. To achieve this state of leisure, they always dilate in phase with the surrounding dilaton field. Of course, for such a thing to happen, there has got to be a fundamental dilaton music to be played. Otherwise a cacophony would ensue.

The Fundamental Dilator concept provides this basic chord. There is an very good analogy to the Universe and the ever ringing of a tune and small variations of it. This analogy is what I seek to emphasize in my book: The Flying Orchestra. The fundamental dilator represents the four fundamental particles (proton, electron, positron and antiproton). In a four-dimensional spatial manifold, sound (metric waves) has not only a displacement volume, but also a tilt or orientation with respect to our 3D Universe. When the tilt is zero (the dilator is flush with our Universe) there is interaction. At any other angle there is NO INTERACTION. This means that my Universe is stroboscopic or that there is a pseudo time-quantizaton. I mean pseudo, because time flows unhindered. The appearance of time quantization is due to interaction intermittence. This phenomenon results in our Quantum Mechanics. More precisely, pseudo time-quantization plus the fundamental dilator plus the Quantum Lagrangian Principle plus the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Shockwave topology yields Quantum Mechanics.

The Fundamental Dilator is what has eluded your project, I suppose. One cannot create the theory of everything would reviewing our concept of particles.

This is the Balls Diagram which conveys what I said about metric waves (dilaton) and wavegenerators (dilators). They have not only amplitude, sign but also orientation (tilt/orientation or spinning).

The lettering was used to indicate the orientation of the metric deformation coherence with respect to the 3D lightspeed expanding hyperspherical shockwave Universe. Interaction happens only when the letters are horizontal.

Despite of having place the Balls sidewise, they are really appearing on the same place as we travel along the R direction (perpendicular to our 3D Universe) at the speed of light. Their change in nature is achieved by tunneling between different stationary states of local metric deformation, that is, space can be deformed in a quantized manner.

Being an electron or a proton or an antiproton or a positron only depends upon which phase is horizontal with respect to the 3D Universe. Of course, the difference between matter and antimatter is just a minus sign, that is, a proton is defined (at an specific Cosmological Time) as a large dilation of the local metric, and and antiproton is a large shrinkage of the local metric. Half cycle away, they would invert definition since being matter or antimatter is a relative event. The electron is a small (1/2000 times the proton amplitude) shrinkage of the local metric and a positron is a small dilation of the local metric. The states are represented by the diagram below.

Of course, I kept everything I could keep from the current view of the Universe. I don’t have a psychological need of imprinting myself onto each and every bit of my theory. I believe what I am building has the best parts or ideas of my predecessors. It is always convenient to keep as much of the logical framework people are used to for didactics sake. I kept everything that made sense, that is. The state numbers are assigned to the three axial lengths of a 3D hyper-ellipsoid of revolution. Notice that the difference between states is just orientation. States (0,-1/3,-2/3) and (0,-2/3,-1/3) differ just by a 90 degrees rotation within our 3D space. Since this is a dynamic process, the degeneration in energy is irrelevant. The states degeneration is lifted by the fact that it takes time to rotate a deformation by 90 degrees.

3D rotations are at the heart of the transmutation notes required to transmutate one particle into another or to provide the scaffolding needed to create all hyperons. I will someday explain how to do it in my blog “Splitting Hairs and Neutrinos”..:)

I will not repeat the lengthy hyperons family description. You can find it within the pdf and the pages of this blog.

The Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Shockwave topology provides the support for all the observed phenomena in Astronomy. From Hubble expansion, double jet Black Holes, Gamma Ray Bursts, the Precession of the Mercury Perihelion, Gravitational Lensing, the Pioneer Anomaly, all these phenomena have been presented within this blog. NO NEED for Dark Matter, Dark Energy or Darth Vader..:)

Within the framework of this theory lies the basis for Nonlinear Hadronics which would make it possible to eliminate Mankind’s energy needs and allow for us to travel outside our galactic neighborhood.

The energy needs are fulfilled by the Coherent Nuclear Fusion processes which I proposed and described in a letter to Steven Chu. Other applications of the theory can be explained if someone bother to ask..:)

This is a recapitulation of the theory to dispel the idea that this theory has potential..:) This theory is fully developed and explains everything…:)

Now let’s answer your nice questions.

The first allusion I want to tackle is the mentioning of the Higgs bosons. In my theory, there is no need for Higgs Boson…In fact, if people reading about the Higgs Boson had a brain they would notice the lack of details on how one distinguishes one boson from the Higgs Boson. Bosons are particles with integer spin. There are several particles like that, although most have spin zero (integer but zero, e.g. delta zero, pion zero, gamma zero etc)… How is that the experiment will prove that a given particle is giving mass to another particle. The only way I can think about is to collide that particle with another and see if inertia just disappears or gets multiplied by a larger number… I’ve never heard any experimental detail that would indicate that the good people of the Large Hadron Collider is pursuing this avenue. I don’t think it is a feasible experiment due to the short life of particles. Thus I have trouble believing that anything conclusive would ever come out of a head-on collisional experiment. Of course, my theory can be easily probed by a sidewise (collinear focusing) collision velocity dependence experiment.

In my theory there is no mass. Inertial mass is the footprint of the dilator onto the Fabric of Space. The Fabric of Space is used interchangeably with the Lightspeed Expanding 3D Shockwave Hyperspherical Universe for obvious reasons..:) If you see equations where mass, electron charge is part of it, you can be sure that those are the connections of my theory to current knowledge. I recover the laws of nature as currently understood to ground my theory into our current understanding.

The 4D mass is the displacement volume equivalent to the coherent addition of the displacement volumes of four contributions (the four phases of the fundamental dilator metric deformation coherence add coherently since they are in phase with the dilaton field – both travel at the speed of light and the dilator is at the holospatial frame of reference).

Thus there is a difference between inertial and gravitational mass..:) although they are proportional at the level of neutral dilator complexes. When dealing with simple dilators (electron and protons), there is a factor of two because of the destructive interference occurring in the neutral dilator complex (spin zero gravitational dilators)…:) Of course, this might sound mysterious but it is addressed clearly in another page of this blog. Here there is no need for hocus pocus or sleights of hand..:)

In summary, the concept of inertial mass is replaced by its in phase displacement metric footprint. The concept of gravitational mass is associated with the dilaton field a dilator complex (e.g. a hydrogen atom) yields.

I showed in the past that the total dilaton field generated by a hydrogen atom is approximately equal to the one of a single dilator. Since neutral particles and neutrons are basic combination of hydrogen atoms, the inertial mass is approximately equal to the gravitational mass.

You question about the origin of Gravitation. All forces are derived from the same interaction: dilator-dilaton field interaction guided by the Quantum Lagrangian Principle which has nothing quantum mechanical about it. The principle is called Quantum Lagrangian Principle because it originates Quantum Mechanics.

The derivation of our common knowledge Gravitational Law is derived within the pdf and has been reviewed within the blog.

I digressed about the paradigm of 4D spacetime deformation and the application of the Quantum Lagrangian Principle within the blog. There is more than one paradigm that will yield the same result. Remember that whatever Einstein proposed in a 4D spacetime has to be a skewed view of a phenomenon happening within a 5D spacetime that I proposed.

This means that both models have to be compatible. If you decide to talk about 4D spacetime then local metric deformation due to an aggregation of dilators (large mass black hole for instance) will be a fine model. If you want to think about what is really happening the topology is more complex…:) You do have a lightspeed traveling framework and observes only what crosses the Fabric of Space.

Ultimately gravitation and all forces all comes naturally from the simplest equation you will ever see. The Grand Unification Equation is shown in my pdf and has been presented before here.

The distinction between gravitational mass (neutral dilator complexes) and charged masses (charged particles, e.g. electrons, protons) appears in the distinct behavior of the two probes. The charged particles are allowed to change their k-vectors while the neutral matter only changes location at each de Broglie step of the expansion of the Universe.

The observed change in k-vector (acceleration) at each de Broglie step is 10^38 times smaller for neutral dilators complexes (gravitation) as it is for simple dilators (electrons, protons), thus the difference in strength between Gravitation and Electromagnetism.

Of course, Magnetism is dependent upon motion. Motion (velocity) is modeled within the spacetime cross-section of my Universe and it is sensitive to Doppler effect or Lorentzian Length contraction. The deformation of the dilator field of electrons within a conductor together with the non-deformation of the dilaton field of the nuclei (they don’t move) yields an effective dipolar dilaton field emanating from any wire where a current passes through. This has been used to derived the fundamental law of Magnetism (Biot-Savart).

It suffices since the final objective of any theory is to describe motion of matter or charged particles at motion or repose with respect to each other.

The other forces (Strong and Weak or Electro-Weak) are explained away by replacing the Standard Model (elimination of Quarks) and by introducing the concept of Nonlinear Hadronics, thus explaining the structure of neutrons and other isotopes.

Let summarize, FS (Fabric of Space) is the locus that travels at the speed of light. In the RXYZ, framework (left panel), it is a perfect circle or hypersphere (if you don’t consider an specific cross-section). Thus there isn’t any mass induced curvature.

On the TauXYZ framework (right panel) the story is slightly more complex. In that framework there is an absolute time PHI and the proper time tau which is a projection of PHI into the proper time axis. Within Einstein theory, he only perceived the proper time, he could conceive a paradigm that embraced both proper and absolute time.

If you only think about proper time and don’t understand the correct laws of dynamics (which rules both chemistry, mechanics,electromagnetism, gravitation, nuclear decaying reactions or nuclear chemistry), then you will have to consider that space is curved. This is equivalent to say that the projections or overlapping dilaton field onto the Fabric of Space is more closely spaced with the proximity of a larger mass (black hole).

Both paradigm yield the same result. That is, you can think about equally spaced dilaton topographic lines or circles drawn onto a curved space or you can think about increasingly closer circles drawn onto a flat surface. Both paradigms will yield the same dynamics. The first is good for Einstein, the second is mine..:)

Cheers, Peter

PS – By the way, I was always attracted to Sweden and when I was a kid I considered moving there. I liked the freedom of being a scientist in a society that allows for you not to spend your lifetime and mind on making money for the retirement age…:) I though that my mind would be freer there than in any other place… not to mention the mythological Swedish bikini team (Brazilian Mythology)…:) an idea that inhabited my mind during my teenage years…:) and still does every so often..:)

Cheers.

Comments (0)

December 11, 2009

Comment on Does God Play Dice

Filed under: Comment on Does God Play Dice — admin @ 9:33 pm

JD has left a new comment on your post “Does God Play Dice“:

On the (phases) of particles…that makes sense for the quarks…particles of the same…or close to the same mass…particle phsyics would be simpler if electrons and protons had similar mass….being as their charge is near opposite….”Dice” no, we are God’s ahem..”Experiment”…the universe plays dice ie…gamma ray burst..

I would like to thank JD for his enigmatic comment. Enigmatic since I mentioned that my paradigm shift (The Fundamental Dilator) eliminates the mass asymmetry between protons and electrons..:) It is like my pearls felt onto some deaf ears..:)

My theory rethinks the Universe Laws within a four dimensional spatial framework where the 3D Universe is a lightspeed traveling hyperspherical thin shell. Since the spatial manifold is four-dimensional, my Fundamental Dilator can be assigned a phase (phase of tunneling relative to spinning or rotating in the 4D spatial manifold).

As the Fundamental Dilator coherence spins, only an extremely well defined phase (overlap of the thin dilator with the thin hyperspherical shell) is seen in our Universe. That is the phase I mentioned, not something that people don’t understand like a wavefunction phase – which is a 3D cross-section of the 4D dilaton field.

This relationship between the 4D dilaton field and the associated de Broglie waves (and thus the wavefunction within the Schrodinger’s equation) was explained when I tackled the Double-Slit Interference problem.

Today, I will not repeat myself. I will just give some hints where to find the understanding that you seek for soooo long.

“Dice” no, we are God’s ahem..”Experiment”…the universe plays dice ie…gamma ray burst..

I guess, I should NOT complain when my readers are whimsical themselves since I feel quite good when I manage to say something deep and mysterious..:)

Cheers, JD

PS- Please feel free to ask questions. You are soooo close to the Truth..:)

Comments (0)

November 22, 2009

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 9:54 pm

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Our love for knowledge and beauty has always driven us to find the most sublime analogies to represent what we are seeing in the Universe. Einstein wanted to read God’s Mind. The Hypothetical Higgs Boson has been named by some as the God Particle. I equated the steps of my Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe as being somewhat similar to the Pendulum of Brahma. At each cycle we see ourselves changed by that Universal Operator.

Mathematics is always the Golden Standard of beauty. We always hope to find a nicely fitting mathematical equation to describe the whole Universe. Mathematicians (String Theorists) are especially hopeful..:). Of course, after all, that would be redemption to their endeavor of creating the least physical (most mathematical) theory in history.

Euler’s theorem attachment to the Strong Force model was immediately recognized as the sign we are on the right track, after all, for a theory to be correct it has to be aesthetically beautiful….:) Form over content…very typical of our Mankind always driven by superficial calculations….:)

It just happens that there isn’t any indication that physics doesn’t matter, that is, there isn’t any indication that at the end of all, we will have everything described by a simple mathematical equations that overrules all physical properties.

For example, there is the wave equation which describes all waves as long as they have a natural velocity or one knows the elasticity of the medium where those waves propagate. This means that even though, the knowledge of an equation which would describe such a general phenomena as waves, the physics is still there in the form of a pesky constant.. J

This does not demerit the scientists who found those beautiful equations, it just serves as a reminder that there might be a limit on what mathematical abstraction can achieve.

It has been said with some understated deepness that the Riemann Hypothesis might be the solution to the Theory of Everything, that is, something, some force, some string might be represented somehow by the zeros of the Zeta function along the critical line. The details are fuzzy since this is just a guess.

Scientists look down to Horoscopists all their lives…J It is well know that vague statements can always find resonance within some fraction of the population and thus keep the readers happy and aware of their daily best options…J

One might say that the same happens in Science. There is a difference. Since we are a much more educated bunch than the average person, our guesses are better educated..:) that is, there is something deep in the number theory applied to Primes..:)

Of course, this is just because people doesn’t know how to think about numbers and one should expect that if the zeros of an equation are primes, most likely the logic behind the construction of the equation is such that only certain primes will be zeros..:) It is like being surprised that (x-1)*(x-2)=0 has zeros equal to 1 and 2.

Number theory is just not developed enough to see the underlying logic behind the Riemann Hypothesis and the Zeta Function (or Eta Function on the Analytic Continuation).

As usual, the statement that the Riemann Hypothesis should be relevant to our understanding of the Universe can be decomposed into the simpler statement that Primes will be relevant..:) I am a simple minded man, so I cut to the chase and will explore this proposition..:)

Nobody bothered to think about Primes because nothing in Physics looks like Primes. If a poor string theorist looks around and think about making Primes to be some property of strings them we might end up with 10^500000000000000 possible Universes or string theories explaining each one of them..:)

A Standard Model Physicist is not in much better position. Let say that zero are electromagnetic waves, the ONE is…J The next basic particles are electron and Proton … Neutron might be TWO but that does not solve the problem. Electrons and Protons are certainly not equal in the Standard Model and the analogy dies there…J

Of course, that is not the case in the Hypergeometrical Universe.

ARE CHARGED PARTICLES PRIMES

YES.

In my theory one can easily relate ZERO to the dilaton field and its spatial modulation (electromagnetic waves).

ONE is clearly the Fundamental Dilator which represents all four fundamental particles (Electron, Proton, AntiElectron, AntiProton).

TWO is of course the Neutron

THREE are the Pions

FIVE are the SIGMAS AND LAMBDAS

SEVEN are the KAONS

ELEVEN are the XIS Star – This Channel decays into a KaonZero and a Pion Minus.

THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS

ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS

YES. I am sure the numerologists will have a field day..:)

As in any good Horoscope, there is a caveat. There are exclusions to the Prime Rule. They are associated with another nice mathematical formula, the formula for 2 to the power of another number. (0,2,4,8,16…)

ZERO is again the Dilaton Field or its origin modulated version (Electromagnetic Wave).

TWO is the precursor to a Gamma photon from the annihilation of a Positron-Electron pair.

FOUR is the Pion Zero

EIGTH is the KAON ZERO

Later, I will show how the mathematical space topology and mathematical instrumentation needed to solve the Riemann Hypothesis also describes the mass of the Hyperons…J

A hint. Look at the Fundamental Dilator coherence ‘energy’ diagram. The degenerated states on the two potential wells lose their degeneration due to the finite velocity of light, which creates a time delay for a spatial rotation within the 3D Lightspeed Expanding Hypersphere.

Think about what does it means to be real…J and read the Meaning of Material Existence blog I wrote in the past.

ARE THERE Neutral PARTICLES = 2*N NUMBERS

As in any good Horoscope, there is always something for everyone. It just happens that 2N is also a valid mapping for Neutral Particles.

Of course, since they decompose into opposite charged particles, they have to be the SUM OF TWO PRIMES or 2 Majorama Particles…J

Cheers,

Comments (2)

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Filed under: Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe — admin @ 7:52 pm

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Euler’s Beta Function relationship to the Strong Force model was immediately recognized as the sign we are on the right track, after all, for a theory to be correct it has to be aesthetically beautiful….:) Form over content…very typical of our Mankind always driven by superficial calculations….:)

For example, there is the wave equation which describes all waves as long as they have a natural velocity or one knows the elasticity of the medium where those waves propagate. This means that even though we have the knowledge of an equation which would describe such a general phenomena as waves, the physics is still there in the form of a pesky constant..

This does not demerit the scientists who found those beautiful equations, it just serves as a reminder that there might be a limit on what mathematical abstraction can achieve.

Scientists look down to Horoscopists all their lives…:) It is well know that vague statements can always find resonance within some fraction of the population and thus keep the readers happy and aware of their daily best options…

It is like being surprised that f(x)=(x-1)*(x-2) has zeros equal to 1 and 2.

Number theory is just not developed enough to see the underlying logic behind the Riemann Hypothesis and the Zeta Function (or Eta Function on the Analytic Continuation).

As usual, the statement that the Riemann Hypothesis should be relevant to our understanding of the Universe can be decomposed into the simpler statement that Primes will be relevant..:) I am a simple minded man, so I will cut to the chase and explore this proposition..:)

Of course, that is not the case in the Hypergeometrical Universe.

ARE CHARGED PARTICLES PRIMES

YES.

In my theory one can easily relate ZERO to the dilaton field and its spatial modulation (electromagnetic waves).

ONE is clearly the Fundamental Dilator which represents all four fundamental particles (Electron, Proton, AntiElectron, AntiProton).

TWO is of course the Neutron

THREE are the Pions

FIVE are the CRAZY DELTAS

SEVEN are the KAONS

ELEVEN are the XIS Star – This Channel decays into a KaonZero and a Pion Minus.

THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS

ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS

YES. I am sure the numerologists will have a field day..:)

TWO is the precursor to a Gamma photon from the annihilation of a Positron-Electron pair.

FOUR is the Pion Zero

EIGTH is the KAON ZERO

Later, I will show how the mathematical space topology and mathematical instrumentation needed to solve the Riemann Hypothesis also describes the mass of the Hyperons…:)

Think about what does it means to be real…:) and read the Meaning of Material Existence blog I wrote in the past.

ARE THERE Neutral PARTICLES = 2*N NUMBERS

As in any good Horoscope, there is always something for everyone. It just happens that 2N is also a valid mapping for Neutral Particles.

Of course, since they decompose into opposite charged particles, they have to be the SUM OF TWO PRIMES (Goldbach’s Conjecture) or 2 Majorama Particles…:)

SIX is the DELTA ZERO

Now that you know the answer to the question, it should be easier to derive the equation that describes the process…:) I wrote a book called The Flying Orchestra, which represents our journey through the Universe inside the Ligthspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe. Most of us are composed of isotopes, which turned out to be quite harmonious dimensional notes. The Hyperons are the basic notes of our Universe, that is, the most unique, cacophonous notes one can create- like Heavy Metal…:)

In comparison, the isotopes are like Mozart Symphonies…NAH….in fact, they are quite boring and more like Kenny G

In the next few blogs, I will address the isotopes, the mass equation (or God Equation if you so prefer .

I am awaiting for Steven Chu to say something before I write about how to make a neutral particle accelerator or anything accelerator or dimensional accelerator…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 7:49 pm

Riemann Hypothesis and The Hypergeometrical Universe

This does not demerit the scientists who found those beautiful equations, it just serves as a reminder that there might be a limit on what mathematical abstraction can achieve.

Number theory is just not developed enough to see the underlying logic behind the Riemann Hypothesis and the Zeta Function (or Eta Function on the Analytic Continuation).

Of course, that is not the case in the Hypergeometrical Universe.

ARE CHARGED PARTICLES PRIMES

YES.

In my theory one can easily relate ZERO to the dilaton field and its spatial modulation (electromagnetic waves).

ONE is clearly the Fundamental Dilator which represents all four fundamental particles (Electron, Proton, AntiElectron, AntiProton).

TWO is of course the Neutron

THREE are the Pions

FIVE are the SIGMAS AND LAMBDAS

SEVEN are the KAONS

ELEVEN are the XIS Star – This Channel decays into a KaonZero and a Pion Minus.

THIRTEEN are the LUCKY OMEGAS

ARE Neutral Majorama PARTICLES 2^N NUMBERS

YES. I am sure the numerologists will have a field day..:)

ZERO is again the Dilaton Field or its origin modulated version (Electromagnetic Wave).

TWO is the precursor to a Gamma photon from the annihilation of a Positron-Electron pair.

FOUR is the Pion Zero

EIGTH is the KAON ZERO

Later, I will show how the mathematical space topology and mathematical instrumentation needed to solve the Riemann Hypothesis also describes the mass of the Hyperons…J

Think about what does it means to be real…J and read the Meaning of Material Existence blog I wrote in the past.

Cheers,

Comments (0)

November 15, 2009

Listen Dr Fate’s Music…:) I love it…:)

Filed under: Listen Dr Fate's Music...:) I love it...:) — admin @ 9:29 pm

Dr. Fate

I am not someone given to believe in Fate. Unless it is Scientific Fate or the Fate of my scientific theory…

My last Blog explored the need to believe or better the imperative for believing contained in certain widely accepted theories. As you might know, wide acceptance is not an assurance of correctness..:)

By the way, surrounding oneself just with friendly admirers is what academia has been doing and that is what precluded a stronger revaluation of current models and created the censorship conditions that prevail today. One should welcome ideas and their purporters if they pass basic scrutiny. I did that with Dr. Chucanov. If one idea is not good, it shouldn’t take a big effort to pinpoint its flaws.

For example: The Standard Model started with some nicely defined Up and Down Quarks… As usual, they asked us to believe. Someday, in some huge accelerator we would meet those little things and be happy that we knew they would come..:) When they did not appear, they asked us to believe that they were glued together…:) Oh, Good Lord….

Peter Higgs demanded us to believe that a Boson would come out of collisions in the heart of another beast (another accelerator – Large Hadron Collider)… It is just the beast that changed, the request is the same —- Faith ….

No wonder some people see some similarities between Religion and Science. Both can be dogmatic and censor iconoclastic non members of the choir…

Despite of this requirement of Faith, I believe that Fate is a slightly different concept. They sound pretty much the same to me, but in one we have to drop disbelieve, rationality, questioning (Faith) while in the other we only have Rationality, Questioning to hold us up…

My believe in Fate is that there will be a theory in which things will fit so well and make so much sense that Anyone Will Be Able To See That Truth Has Been Spoken.

Of course, that will have to be followed by hardcore experimental proof…:)

A theory is just a guide…… A great theory can be a map…

Currently, I am placing my bets on my theory. I had other “Theories” in the past, but I knew that they were just concoctions in which things pointed, maybe, in the correct direction but they didn’t hold water properly..;)

I’ve never bother people with hare-brain schemes like Peter Higgs or Alan Guth (Higgs Boson and The Inflation Theory), but I decided that The Hypergeometrical Universe deserved a closer look.

There is a path for redemption for Peter Higgs and Alan Guth or any other Big Wig. It is very simple, just take a position in favor of bringing (my theory and others) back into the realm of discussion… Not unlike reopening the Plenarium for debate.

Unsettle Physics!!!

Of course, that would be slightly detrimental to your Superstar status but in History that would make you even Bigger. It takes a real scientist to second guess himself/herself, to revise one’s own hypotheses and to appreciate the beauty in someone else’s ideas.

Currently, I believe that the Fate of this theory is to have its own life. I am just the messenger.

Some people mentioned that Science requires a highly mathematical framework. I don’t believe that to be the case. Any theory is just simple ideas dressed up in algebra. The ideas behind them are always quite simple…an Harmonic Oscillator here, a vibrating string there, mapping mass to a self-energy or not….making infinite equal to zero…. etc…etc…

All the math, the proposed Lagrangians, Green Function Propagators, Feymann Diagrams sums, Dyson Theorem, etc. are simple ideas… Superstrings wrapped around Calabi-Yau manifolds always reminds me Bacon Wrapped Scallops…:)

Those are simple analogies and they taste great…:)

I used Naked Science in my blog because it shows how rich this theory is and how much easier it is to think in terms of physical ideas than to get lost in algebra.

The goal is to See The Florest By The Trees..:)

If you oppose censorship, click the Chicken below and learn all about my plight…:)

Cheers,

PS- Read this with the musical background…:) By the way, I identify myself with Dr. Fate…:)

Of course, not being a connosseur of marvel comics, I suspect Dr. Fate is a Force of Good..:)

Sapor Similis Pullus

Comments (0)

November 8, 2009

Comment on the Mercury Perihelion Solution

Filed under: Comment on the Mercury Perihelion Solution — admin @ 10:09 am

Comments are always welcome

Comment on the Mercury Perihelion Solution

I found this site using google and i want to thank you for your work. You have done really very good site. Great work, great site! Thank you!

Sorry for offtopic

Comments are always welcome, as well as solid criticism. I tried to tie down the theory the best I could without the benefit of criticism…:)

In the Mercury Perihelion Prequel, I reviewed the why Paul Gerber’s work was dismissed. He started with a velocity dependent formula for which he couldn’t provide a convincing derivation.

I reproduced his formula when I derived the Gravitation force for a non-rotating Sun..:) In fact, Gerber’s formula is a limiting value of my more general formula.

Of course, nobody derives the Gravitational formula from first principles in any theory other than in this one. Remember that this theory is derived to explain motion, interaction, action-at-distance and does it through the Quantum Lagrangian Principle and the Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Shock-Wave Universe Topology. All forces come naturally when I reconnected this theory to our Physics.

The derivation was done in the relaxed Fabric of Space condition, that is, I started the derivation using a flat local Fabric of Space.

I considered interaction between dilators where the probe dilator was moving radially with the expansion of the Universe. This happens when the local fabric of space is totally relaxed and its normal points radially- perpendicularly to our 3D Universe. This means that the force was derived as a partial derivative of the deformation of the local fabric of space from a given initial velocity(zero velocity). This is equivalent in Strict Relativity to consider the relative velocity zero while the bodies interact. Under those conditions, SR is well approximated by Newtonian Dynamics.

To recover the force for any velocity one has to use the Lagrangian Force equivalent, which we used on the Mercury Perihelion Prequel. For the case of Gravitational Lensing, the velocity amplitude (c) doesn’t change. The only change is its direction. Under those conditions, the partial derivative was fine.

This is means that Paul Gerber’s ansatz equation for a velocity dependent Gravitation was OK. He just did not have a understanding of the WHY…:)

As I mentioned, this theory passed the basic tests a theory has to pass to be discussed (Gravitational Lensing, Mercury’s Perihelion, reproduced all the necessary forces and provide an alternative description to the remaining forces strong and electroweak).

There are a few remaining blogs I want to write but have been too busy to do. One of them has to do with our interest in traveling within our galactic neighborhood. This blog will disclose a new propulsion mechanism which is good enough for short travels.

To go further there is a way to create macroscopic Fabric of Space waves which would lead to light speed traveling of massive bodies. I know that this is forbidden by Relativity..:) of course, it is..:) but that is a just an artifact of the Newtonian choice of Force definition.

It is not that massive bodies cannot travel at the speed of light, it is that due to how one chose to interact them makes their interaction ineffectual to accelerate them to the speed of light. I will propose another mechanism to create motion.

I wrote about Newton’s, Galileo’s blunders…Of course, I’ve never meant to minimize their contribution… Just a provocative hindsight consideration aimed at creating a debate..:) As I always mention, nothing would be done without the work of our predecessors, luminaries..and no good theory can be built without strong debate and criticism.

Please, always feel free to compliment but also accept your need to criticize it. It is OK…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

September 29, 2009

Comment on Dr. Steven Chu’s Letter

Filed under: Comment on Dr. Steven Chu's Letter — admin @ 8:00 pm

Comment on Dr.

Steven Chu’s Letter

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post “Letter to Dr. Steven Chu”:

You do understand that electrons and protons are completely different things, right? Electrons are fundamental particles, and protons are made of three quarks (two up quarks and one down quark) with gluons keeping the together.

Regardless, have you heard back from Dr. Chu yet?

If not, the point I mentioned above may be the reason, OR you mentioned “revise Science.” I’m sure you meant well, but I think it comes across as too bold.

This comment was left by a well-meaning scientist…:)

He was way too kind. If I hadn’t paid attention to the fact that seemingly a Proton and an Electron are different entities (different things), I would be arrogant.

That is a basic piece of knowledge mankind accumulated during its journey towards illumination…:)

He mentioned that by stating that my theory was an attempt to revise science, I had come across as too bold.

Hadn’t I paid attention to the very relevant detail that an electron is different from a proton in the current understanding, I would be more than bold, I would be really stupid and arrogant.

Despite of the fact that I don’t put my picture and name on each and every page of my blog, my name and information can be easily found in the pdfs. I believe that my theory is important, I am not. I am just the carrier. This means that everything I stated here, if wrong, would damage my projected image.

As the saying goes, Egg would be on my face. I think this is how science should be discussed.

There’s got to be a penalty for overlooking a relevant piece of information in a scientific discussion.

I chose to have a public review of my theory and never shied away from criticism. In fact, I didn’t have an option other than to post it here in this corner of the internet…:) . Well, it is also published in two books.

This lack of anonymity from my side is also the reason why I asked scientists to name themselves. That makes the discussion more interesting and intellectually more honest.

Don’t be shy, just remember that everything you say will live forever in the net..:)

The word revision comes from many things in my theory. A very salient new paradigm in my theory is the Fundamental Dilator shown below:

This is called the Balls Diagram because I used Balls to denote the orientation (by the lettering orientation) and tunneling phase of the 4D spatial metric deformation coherence with respect to our 3D Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe.

The spinning creates a stroboscopic effect (interaction only occurs when the deformations are flush with the 3D Hypersphere) which yields both Quantum Mechanics and the distinct character of the four fundamental particles (electron, proton, positron and antiproton).

On the other hand, one has to have Balls (in the figurative sense) to propose such a revolutionary model. Here Electrons, positrons, antiprotons and protons are really different phases of the same entity. I call this concept a revision of what we currently consider to be a particle.

If you had read a fraction of my theory, you would know that I proposed a paradigm where the four fundamental particles are just phases of the same metric deformation coherence.

A Horse is a Horse, of course, of course…:) and a Proton is different from an Electron, unless we are dealing with a revisionist theory (different view of the same reality) where they are the same…:)

Had you named yourself, it would be clear that you cast a comment without reading the basic tenets of my theory and egg would be on your face…:) It is just fair…:)

I would be delighted to discuss the theory with my critics – right here because this is the only place where a broad scope theory can be debated. If this were a review of my work, never in a million years could I point out that the reviewer didn’t do a good job ..>:) In fact, the reviewer missed all the relevant points…:) (if you don’t believe, read my other blog with the censorship events).

By the way, if I were wrong, I would love to hear a good argument. I hate wasting time and have other things to do…:)

I was asked if I received any reply from Dr. Steven Chu. I can tell that there has been a pick-up on the interest level of my theory.

Below you can see the Maploco displaying readers from several places:

Cambridge – Probably MIT’s Dr Guth..>:)

Alamogordo – Most likely radioative scientists from White Sands…:) (I am guessing…:)

Berkeley – Probably some brilliant string theorist…:)

Stockholm, Sweden – Probably the Nobel Prize Committee…;)
Ithaca – Probably Dr. Paul Ginsparg..>:)

Many of my visitors do not leave comments, which is a shame…:) As you know, everyone is tempted to put down other people’s ideas..>:) but very few have the courage to say something positive about someone else’s controversial work..>:)

Dr Steven Chu, most likely asked our Luminaries to go and find out what this theory is about..>:)

I hope they do a better job than our well-meaning scientist. It would be inappropriate to conclude that the lack of a reply means that the theory is incorrect …:)

The case in point is that most people have biases (e.g. an electron is a different ‘particle’ from a proton) and will simply discard the theory without even reading it as did the current critic. Of course, if the concept of particle were the only way to describe the immutable electron and if the electron were really immutable, then they would be right…:) I question the immutability and the concept that particle or particle-wave are the only way to describe an electron…:) Not only question, but provided an alternative description where there is no immutability and instead of a particle or particle/wave, the electron is modeled as a metric deformation coherence (thus highly mutable..:) and better described as a traveling wave-generator…

Of course, I also provided a new paradigm for interaction which yields quantum mechanics and relativity. I proposed that Relativity is in the eyes of the beholder in my posting The Image in the Mirror , that is, the hyperbolic nature of spacetime is due to the choice of equations of motion. I also solved a paradox there…:)

Using the Quantum Lagrangian Principle, the limiting velocity of light comes naturally…:)

Returning to the problem of biased critics. They might do with nice words like “well-meaning” but what is really important is that they read the theory before reaching a conclusion…:) or at least read the basic and very controversial paradigms and make a critique of them before concluding something..:)

Every so often, I repost my “The Silence of the Lambs” posting as a guide to controversy and to help critics to find their way without too much reading..>:)

I would like to make the discussion more fluent.

The Silence of the Lambs verses about the silence of the scientific community after being hit by a much simpler alternative explanation of the Universe. This would be the time that I would expect them to jump up and down and say Occam’s Razor ..>:) as so many of them like to do…:) ( I hate that pompous line of speech). It contains many if not most of the controversial points of this theory in a bullet point form.

Thanks for the opportunity to point the why my theory revises science. It proposes a paradigm that provides an alternative view of particles, the cosmos etc….

Cheers,

Location	Time
Astoria, NY, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:18:18 -0500
Atlanta, GA, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:38:49 -0500
Astoria, NY, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:32:29 -0500
Euless, TX, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:13:01 -0500
Pasadena, CA, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:49:54 -0500
Carrollton, TX, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:14:16 -0500
Wayne, NJ, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:59:58 -0500
Long Beach, CA, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:55:51 -0500
Seoul, Korea, Republic of	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:42:11 -0500
New York, NY, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:21:50 -0500
New York, NY, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:02:56 -0500
Cambridge, MA, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:35 -0500
Hoboken, NJ, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:12:14 -0500
Joliet, IL, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:50:12 -0500
, United Kingdom	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:28:26 -0500
Alamogordo, NM, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:54:06 -0500
New York, NY, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:39 -0500
Bridgeport, CT, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:04:48 -0500
Bangkok, Thailand	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:22:21 -0500
Berkeley, CA, United States	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:08:46 -0500
Warren, NJ, United States	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:50:25 -0500
Wayne, NJ, United States	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:49:52 -0500
Lawrenceville, GA, United States	Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:39:34 -0500

Mamaroneck, NY, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:55:11 -0500
Stockholm, Sweden	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:44:47 -0500
, Europe	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:55:55 -0500
Bayonne, NJ, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:22:00 -0500
North Dartmouth, MA, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:24:23 -0500
East Brunswick, NJ, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:04:22 -0500
Peoria, AZ, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:54:04 -0500
Cambridge, MA, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:07:55 -0500
Rosedale, NY, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:03:06 -0500
Washington, DC, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:50:34 -0500
Montgomery, AL, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:44:59 -0500
Edison, NJ, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:44:36 -0500
Brooklyn, NY, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:26:40 -0500
Ashburn, VA, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:23:34 -0500
Waddy, KY, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:20:14 -0500
Munich, Germany	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:00:33 -0500
Berkeley, CA, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:23:44 -0500
Spokane, WA, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:08:22 -0500
, , United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:03:03 -0500
Warren, NJ, United States	Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:03:54 -0500
Astoria, NY, United States	Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:08:25 -0500
Columbus, OH, United States	Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:56:47 -0500

Clifton, NJ, United States Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:02:56 -0500
Nottingham, United Kingdom Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:55:07 -0500
Gatineau, QC, Canada Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:35:35 -0500
Ithaca, NY, United States Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:33:32 -0500
Mount Kisco, NY, United States Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:27:27 -0500
Yucca Valley, CA, United States Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:11:30 -0500

Comments (0)

August 27, 2009

The Luddites are coming..:)

Filed under: The Luddites are coming..:) — admin @ 7:15 pm

The Luddites are coming..:)

Vedic Astrology has left a new comment on your post “The Cosmic Microwave Background”:

The CMBR is well explained by the Big Bang model – when the universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was smaller, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled enough, stable atoms could form. These atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and the universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog. The photons that were around at that time have been propagating ever since, though growing fainter and less energetic, since the exact same photons fill a larger and larger universe. This is the source for the term relic radiation, another name for theCMBR.

Maybe not..:) This comment doesn’t come from a real Luddite..:) that is, from a real Inflation Theorist..:) The explanation is too imprecise to be rebutted properly.

The first problem is White-Hot Plasma… that is way too cold…:) What is the black-body temperature that corresponds to white…:) 6000 degrees is already yellow…:)

What kind of Big Bang yields just White Hot Matter??????? If you tell me that there is an initial sea of radiation that is decaying into particles, that makes more sense to me…:)

You remember… IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS THE LIGHT..:) not Hot White Plasma…:)

The Astrologist did not provide a time frame for the cooling or thermal equilibration and did not mentioned the requirement that the 15 Billion light years Universe size to be reached in an attosecond after the Big Bang..:) small details, of course…but they are worthy of comments since they require matter to travel faster than the speed of light and then stop or travel at speeds below the speed of light..:) Forget momentum conservation, that is another law that goes off the window in Inflation Theory. It begetts the question of what happens to the light that bounces back from the Universe bondary???? Can we see a reflected Universe there?….:)

Any theory that proposes a finite 3D Universe suffers from this problem. Infinite 3D Universes have bright nights..>:) One cannot win…:)

Notice that my 3D Universe is finite but cannot be traversed neither by matter nor light…:) It expands due to the natural expansion of a 3D shockwave within an infinite 4D spatial manifold. There is no need to create space out of nothing…:) space is always there, we are the stuff that is moving outwards, radially, at the speed of light. Also, nights are dark, not bright due to the expansion of the shockwave radius. Farther apart light sources suffer from Doppler Shifting and no light ever reaches from anyting farther that a radian away or 15.6 billion light years….:)

I will summarise the salient points of any physical model describing the initial few attoseconds of this Universe.

• Instead of White-Hot Plasma, consider Protons, Neutrons, Electrons surrounded by a sea of Gamma Rays.
• Inflation Theory adds to this an almost infinitely fast expansion process where the “boundaries” of the Universe (edge of it, if you will…:) quickly expanded to current positions. With the newly discovery of a continuous expansion, this image has been patched to contain a process of continuous “space creation”… Thus between any two points in the Universe, there is some space been created… I think this doesn’t make absolutely any sense. Of course, almost infinitely fast expansion of the Universe means that matter would be traveling together with the boundaries at speeds larger than the speed of light…:) another offensive hypothesis.
• Considering these two hypotheses, one would expect that the almost infinitely fast expansion would NOT result in thermal equilibrium between Gamma Rays and particles. Does light also speeds up during the Inflation Period????

On the other hand an expansion yields a sudden decrease of density and that means a burst of any radiation that is not “THERMALIZED” that is a burst of Gamma Rays at the beginning of times is something to be expected..:)

As far as I know, there is no indication of any dependency of a Gamma Ray photon wavelength with the size of the Universe. As you know, the Universe is not a box and a Gamma Ray photon is closer to a localized particle than to a normal model (pure frequency) of the Universe box…J

The appropriate reading of inflation theory indicates that the initial expansion takes place in such a short time that there is not time for cooling equilibration. In addition, there is no proven relationship between “The Size of The Universe” and the wavelength of a photon traveling within it. If the Universe were to change the dimensions of everything equally as it changes its own size one would have an atom of the size of a planet…:).. Of course, the inflationary period changes only the distance between particles. On an amazing stretch of imagination one might say that it also changes the wavelength of White-Hot Plasma radiation. The scale of the inflation is such that no Gamma Ray or White-Hot Plasma radiation would survive above DC (zero frequency or thereabouts). Thus one cannot consider that whatever radiation we had at time zero, were to do a wavelength scale corresponding to the size increase of the 3D Universe…:)

The second possible physical argument that one can raise to explain the dependence of radiation wavelength with the size of the Universe is the Variable Size Resonance Cavity Model. In this model, one consider that Universe to be initially a very small box of conducting matter. Inside it, our 3D Universe were sitting hot and bothered….white-hot and bothered…:)

Under those circumstances, radiation is constrained by the permitted normal modes of the Resonance Cavity. As the cavity changes size, there is a crossing or elimination of orthogonality of the different modes and energy relaxes into the new lower modes. Under these circumstances one can consider a radiation cooling process synchronous to the change in the position of the boundaries (Resonant Cavity Dimensions). The physics is similar to considering that the photons were particles with momentum hk bouncing of the walls of this Universe Box. Adiabatic cooling happens when one changes the size of the box quickly. Pressure times Volume should remain the same, that is, larger volume implies lower pressure or lower photon momentum hk…:) This would meant that an Universe expansion would yield photons with lower momentum or larger wavelength.

This is fine and dandy, but it requires that radiation bounces back and forth off those walls during the equilibration period. In a 15 Billion Light Years Resonance Cavity this is a strech…:) In addition that it requires that end of the Universe to be a perfect conductor…:) (superconductor to be precise…:)

I hate to say, but this stinks…:) Not physical process we know would propel all the stars in the Universe at speeds almost infinitely larger than the speed of light… stop their motion after an attosecond…have a perfectly reflective End Of Universe…:) etc..

Let’s review this part of the commentary:

The photons that were around at that time have been propagating ever since, though growing fainter and less energetic, since the exact same photons fill a larger and larger universe. This is the source for the term relic radiation, another name for theCMBR.

Photons do not loose energy – become less energetic by traveling through space. If that were the case one wouldn’t see far aways stars… their radiation would be tired by now..:) There is a funky Tired Photon theory which I discredited in some other posting that talks about tired – less energetic photons due to traveling through distances..:) One cannot take that idea seriously… This idea has been used to keep the Universe nice and infinite…:)

Below is the simple picture I draw to explain what is the meaning of looking into the past or into the distance within our 3D Universe.

This picture was created to explain how to calculate the real age of the Universe using my proposed topology and the appropriate Hubble Law in the Pioneer Anomaly posting

Remember that we are actually looking into the past through a 4D Spatial Manifold… Also notice that light always travels along the 45 degrees direction (the shockwave is also traveling at the speed of light).

Of course, the external hypersphere is running away from the internal sphere with an speed that reaches the speed of light when the internal sphere is just a point..:)

This means that the radiation emanating from that initial 4D point has zero frequency (DC). Any radiation traveling from a slighter period would be in the microwaves, later in the visible etc…:)

Under these conditions, there is no need of thermal equilibration in an attosecond. Gamma radiation is emitted as Gamma Radiation. The observer on Earth will see it as microwaves due to the well known Doppler Effect. THIS IS A PHYSICAL THEORY. No slight of hands, no unproven relationship between exoteric non-observable (Edge of The Universe, Size of The Universe), infinitely fast matter-radiation Thermal equilibrium…etc.

Due to the symmetry of the topology, any place is the Center of The Universe. For the Narcisistic Scientist this is the Ultimate Paradigm..>:)

YOU ARE SO VAIN… I BET YOU THINK THIS THEORY IS ABOUT YOU >:) (Carly Simon)

Here everyone is happy … you are always at the Center of the Universe…

no matter where you are…

I think I ranted enough about that simple and imprecise paragraph.

I would like to thank the Vedic Astrologist for the opportunity to clarify my problems with Inflation Theory and to show how my much simpler explanation explains the events as well or better than the competition..:)

Cheers,

PS- I would love to have scientists to pose their opinions in an up-front manner – without hiding behind the Vedic Philosophy…:) I presented a counter argument based upon my theory, which is the subject of this blog. If one presents an argument supporting another theory and I am kind enough to post it and debate it here, I would expect to receive back a correction to my counter-argument and a critique of how I use my topology to explain the same events (Big Bang).

I am looking forward to that..>:)

Comments (0)

August 15, 2009

Letter to Dr. Steven Chu

Filed under: Letter to Dr. Steven Chu — admin @ 5:06 pm

Dear Dr. Chu,

I created a new paradigm for modeling the Cosmos and particles and ran into trouble getting over the non-scientific barriers one finds when revising science.

The paradigm shift proposes that the 3D Universe is a very thin 3D shockwave traveling at the speed of light within a 4D Spatial Manifold. Thus in my model, the Spacetime Continuum is actually 5D and there are a preferred spatial Direction (R) and an Absolute Time PHI, although both are non-observables from within the 3D Universe or 4D Spacetime Continuum.

The figure that describes such paradigm is reproduced here:

Figure 1. Two cross-sections of the Universe. The internal radius is the speed of light times the age of the Universe. The Green circle represents the 3D Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe or just our 3D Universe (XYZ).

It should be easily verifiable that the standard relativistic reference frames (xTau and x’Tau ‘ related to each other by a Lorentz Transformation ) are at hand from inspecting the PHI.XYZ cross-section shown on the right panel of Fig 1. The left panel contains the RXYZ cross-section.

The more interesting paradigm shift is the representation of particles.

The four elementary particles (Electron, Proton, AntiProton, Positron) are represented by four phases of a metric coherences that spins as it travels at the speed of light with the 3D Shockwave Universe. The spinning makes up for an intermittent overlap of the coherence (dilator) and the 3D Universe (Fabric of Space).

The Fundamental Dilator representing the 4 elementary particles is shown below:

Figure 2. Balls Diagram representing Electron and Positron.

The different phases represent metric dilation (Green) or compression (Red). Being an Electron or a Proton indicates just a difference in displacement volume. The phases with horizontal lettering are flush (full overlap) with the 3D Space while the vertical are not thus having no footprint in it. No footprint implies no interaction. The footprint is modeled as our 3D Mass.

Below are the diagrams for Proton and AntiProton:

Figure 3. Balls diagram representing Proton and AntiProton. The change in color and orientation represents tunneling and spinning concomitant processes.

I was able to represent all hyperons accordingly. Next you can see the representation of a Pion Plus.

Figure 4. Balls Diagram for Pion Plus. This diagram represents a complex coherence with three Fundamental Dilator subcoherences.

The point I want to reach is that this representation is amenable to shifting the paradigm for nuclear reactions from Nuclear Chemistry (with reagent and product states with a barrier in the middle, transition state etc) into Nonlinear Hadronics – where particle creation is the result of nonlinear beating between two coherences.

This paradigm shift gives support for the experiment of COHERENT NUCLEAR FUSION.

Normally one, using the Nuclear Chemistry paradigm collide particles with maximum energy (temperature) such as to create fusion. This paradigm disregards length of interaction and phase-matching angle. A velocity defines and angle with the Fabric of Space and thus one can probe the metric elastic ellipsoid of revolution and find the appropriate phase matching angle.

This means that a COHERENT NUCLEAR FUSION experiment would start with particle beams traveling along the same axis. They would interact by converging under the influence of a magnetic lens. Their conversion length would be defined by their de Broglie wavelength and the focal length of the magnetic length as in a standard nonlinear optical interaction. Under perfect phase-matching condition the productions (beating) would be released at specific angles. That would facilitate energy extraction through magneto-hydrodynamics methods.

I know that this is not the most efficient manner to convey a new idea, but there isn’t other available to me at this time.

I seek support for the evaluation of my ideas and/or the test of them in the aforementioned experiment.

Nuclear Chemistry experiments are not easy or cheap and are defined by committees or very invested scientists. This means that they would always be timid and always err on the side of caution and never test a new revolutionary idea.

If correct, this paradigm shift would permit the solution of energy problems, interplanetary travel etc.

Please take a second looking at my drawings. I believe someone as intelligent as you are would be able to grasp my paradigm quickly.

I will post this message on my site;
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com

By the way, I also derived Grand Unification equations, Cosmological Constants from first principles, explained the Pioneer Anomaly, derived Gravitational Lensing and the Precession of Mercury’s Perihelion etc. Everything is posted in that blog.

Please feel free to ask me any questions or to contact me.

This is a brief exposure of an conceptually challenging revisionist theory. I am not seeking your endorsement or support. I am just mentioning that this theory if correct would lead to a novel path in energy production and that the only way to seeking this new path is through the exploration of novel paradigm (Nonlinear Nuclear Hadronics). The current paradigm wouldn’t support event the simple exploratory experiments needed to test this paradigm, that is, Science needs a theoretical base to even consider other possibilities.

My theory provides that theoretical support.

Thanks,

PS_ I wrote this letter to Dr. Steven Chu in hopes that it brings attention to my new paradigm. Despite of all claims of perfect knowledge of the Universe, including mines…:) Science is still an experimental branch of knowledge. I wrote the letter trying to shortcut the arduous path of bringing a new revision to Science into the mainstream discussion. Earth could use an alternative energy solution to fossil fuels and the sooner the better. The faster I can bring this paradigm into discussion the sooner someone can decide to do the simple experiment to test the Coherent Nuclear Fusion Hypothesis.

Of course, I will continue explaining my theory here. Now there is a possibility of publishing it into a mainstream journal. I will eventually do it while doing my balancing act with life…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

Letter to Dr. Steven Chu

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 4:27 pm

Dear Dr. Chu,

I created a new paradigm for modeling the Cosmos and particles and ran into trouble getting over the non-scientific barriers one finds when revising science.

The paradigm shift proposes that the 3D Universe is a very thin 3D shockwave traveling at the speed of light within a 4D Spatial Manifold. Thus in my model, the Spacetime Continuum is actually 5D and there are a preferred spatial Direction (R) and an Absolute Time f, although both are non-observables from within the 3D Universe or 4D Spacetime Continuum.

The figure that describes such paradigm is reproduced here:

Figure 1. Two cross-sections of the Universe. The internal radius is the speed of light times the age of the Universe.

It should be easily verifiable that the standard relativistic reference frames (xt and x’t ‘ related to each other by a Lorentz Transformation ) are at hand from inspecting the fXYZ cross-section shown on the right panel of Fig 1. The left panel contains the RXYZ cross-section.

The more interesting paradigm shift is the representation of particles.

The Fundamental Dilator representing the 4 elementary particles is shown below:

Figure 2. Balls Diagram representing Electron and Positron.

Below are the diagrams for Proton and AntiProton:

Figure 3. Balls diagram representing Proton and AntiProton. The change in color and orientation represents tunneling and spinning concomitant processes.

I was able to represent all hyperons accordingly. Next you can see the representation of a Pion Plus.

Figure 4. Balls Diagram for Pion Plus. This diagram represents a complex coherence with three Fundamental Dilator subcoherences.

This paradigm shift gives support for the experiment of COHERENT NUCLEAR FUSION.

I know that this is not the most efficient manner to convey a new idea, but there isn’t other available to me at this time.

I seek support for the evaluation of my ideas and/or the test of them in the aforementioned experiment.

If correct, this paradigm shift would permit the solution of energy problems, interplanetary travel etc.

Please take a second looking at my drawings. I believe someone as intelligent as you are would be able to grasp my paradigm quickly.

I will post this message on my site;

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com

Please feel free to ask me any questions or to contact me.

My theory provides that theoretical support.

Thanks,

Comments (0)

August 12, 2009

The Silence of the Lambs

Filed under: The Silence of The Lambs — admin @ 7:21 am

The Silence of The Lambs..:)

This blog is about to reach its 33,000 unique IP readers…:) Hurray!!!!

I didn’t know there were so many cosmologists, string theorists, particle physicists in the planet…:)

There are many reasons to celebrate…

This is a rerun and a review, creating well defined claims and easy targets for criticism…:)

I said many times, I would welcome criticism and that is the reason why this blog was written in the first place – to have a public peer review since the stardard reviewing process is so INAPPROPRIATE for the review of an extensive logical framework.

The theory has been published in two books:

Quantization in Astrophysics – containing the Grand Unification and New Cosmology Paradigm
Hadron Physics New Energy Issues – Containing the Hypergeometrical Standard Model

not that bad for something created in the everyday commuting to work (on a shaking NYC subway..>:)

and reached the following crowning achievements…:)

I demonstrated that the theory provides the appropriate solutions to the Precession of Mercury’s Perihelion and the Gravitational Lensing problems.
In the Gravitional Lensing blog, I showed how a simple reasoning about the usage of Gerber’s potential could be used to show that Gerber’s potential (Hypergeometrical Potential) could predict the correct Gravitational light deflection. Somehow that simple reasoning was beyond the specialists of the time and since then. Einstein, very cunningly, placed the responsibility for the demise of Gerber’s ideas in the hands of the specialists at the time. Something like, I wash my hands..:)
I provided the solution to the Pioneer Anomaly in which I clarify the meaning of Hubble equation and the topology of looking into the past…:)
I provided a full description of all particles (hyperon family and isotopes).
I corrected Newton’s equations by eliminating all non-geometrical elements of Classical Mechanics.
I kept the theory relativistic despite of introducing Absolute Time and a Preferential Frame of Reference or at least a preferential direction of reference (R).
Somehow, it seems that I introduced a geometrical interpretation of Lorentz transforms of all things… I did not hear any angry relativistic cosmologists telling me otherwise…which is a surprise… I thought everyone knew that Lorentz transform is a rotation by an imaginary angle…
I introduced a new model for matter… the first non-obvious model. Up to know things were waves, particles or particle-waves…:) The dilator is a wavegenerator that flows like a wave…:)
The Humble Fundamental Dilator shows how a proton and an electron are the same entity and have the same 4D Mass, thus simplifying tremendously the understanding and unification of the Universe.
The Humble Fundamental Dilator is also the hidden variable Einstein tried throoughout his whole life to find. The entity that creates Quantum Mechanics.
I challenged the concept of Field and showed that implicit in it is the existence of a Cosmological Coherence (all dilators in the Universe dilate in synch with their local dilaton fields). Synchronization is evident using absolute time (in the RXYZ frame).
I Grand Unified all the Forces (Gravitation and Electromagnetism) while providing a replacement for the Gluon-Quark paradigm (the dilator itself) and for the Electroweak force (the advent of nonlinear hadronics)…
In replacing the Gluon-Quark paradigm I modified the symmetry requirements for a Grand Unification or Supersymmetry Theory. The pesky Reciprocal Symmetry is eliminated and with that the need that everything very slow to have the same energy as everything very fast…:) This is an outrageous symmetry… Physicist should be kissing my ring for eliminating such nasty constraint….:)
I proposed the solution for all energy problems in the shape of fusion reactors while produce fusion (or fission) products along a single direction (or cone)…:) Energy is readily extracted through magneto-hydrodynamics means… Charged products make up powerful currents to be slowed down by reversed accelerators…:)
I proposed a new topology for the Cosmos…:) which eliminates the need for Einstein Cosmological Constant, dark energy, inflation… This at a time when inflationary people are adjusting their parameters to explain the whole chimichanga…:) Very unfortunate…:) At least at this time, I would love to say Ockham’s Razor… People have already readied their acceptance speeches for the Nobel Ceremony…:) Horrible situation…:)
In creating this new topology, I explained why the speed of light is the limiting speed in our Fabric of Space..(3D Universe)…
I acknowledged that in fact things can move faster than the speed of light by traveling (surfing) along an interference pattern…:) This might be someday used to create superluminal traveling when people learn how to pattern dilaton fields…:) or die waiting to ride a Tachyon driven spacecraft…:)
I provided the equations to Cosmological Constants (vacuum permittivity and magnetic susceptibility).
I also showed that the Gravitational Constant is not constant and scaled down with the inverse of the age of the Universe….:) Earlier times had stronger Gravitational fields..>:)
The Gravitational “constant” dependence provides the blueprint for the demise of the Universe…:) The relaxation of the dilators… A totally new Cosmogony..>:)
I provided an alternative explanation for the Action-At-Distance paradox which bothered Einstein so much and that is the basis for a total delusional state of mind where people throw their hands up and accept anything..:) from time travel to time traveling backwards in Black Holes … to Black Holes…:)
I also provided an alternative explanation for the Double Slit Experiment. In my theory, dilators (electron included) travel on a four dimensional space at the center of a horospherical reference frame. The waves it creates are the same it surfs, that is, the electron surfs a four-dimensional wave (dilaton field) and by simple projection, it also surfs the 3D projection (de Broglie waves). This means that the de Broglie wave is not a matter wave. Instead, it is a metric deformation wave created by the dilator. The much larger wavelength is due to the way things are projected in an hyperbolic space… The electron in the two slit experiment will travel through a single slit while its dilaton field projection will travel through both…:) On the other side of the barrier, the electron will continue to surf the interferometric dilaton fields and thus will deposit itself on an interferometric pattern onto the detector..:) Very simple and again I would love to say, Ockham’s Razor… despite my qualms about its usage…:)
I provided a simple multi-coherence (dilator dimensional chords) description for each and every hyperon and isotope (isotopes are trivial since they only have protons and neutrons)…: )
I provided an alternative solution to the mass paradigm by assigning it to an overlapping 4D volume (dilator overlapping with the fabric of space at specific phases of the dilator spinning).
I created an extrinsic representation for the Spin…. that obscure quantity that bothered so many quantum physics students for so long…:) and explained What the Hell is the meaning of 1/2 … as you might know rotation description does not include any quadratic potential and thus there isn’t any zero point rotation….:) It was always a bothering 1/2 to me…:)
In making Spin extrinsic, I introduced the delightful Girlfriend on a Swing Gedanken Experiment to show how time could be Pseudo-Quantized..>:)
I corrected all Newton’s equations (Four of them) and provided the really relativistic Biot-Savart law. That law can be used to project better Tokamaks if that is the way one wants to proceed.
Einstein also got his share…:) In creating an Absolute Time and explaining the meaning of inertia, I rebutted Mach’s principle of nonlocal interaction and restored Newton’s Absolute Time..>:) which times the existence of the Universe as opposed to our short existence…:)
I did all this by looking into what people did right and throwing away without fear what people did wrong…:) That was easy since I don’t have to write this as a grant to my reactionary peers..:)
Most of all, I told you that the most important outlet for Physics – The Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository should be in the hands of someone more capable than Paul Ginsparg. It is a shame Science can be silenced by arbitrary actions of a single person…:)

I also pleaded for my Lambs not to remain silent and to speak up their minds. I value criticism and would be happy to post any one of your meaningful comments. I know that in those thirty thousand readers many are scientists (professional scientists).

What I expect from them is either a statement telling me that I made a mistake here or there or some active action against the barriers that precluded a more wider distribution of this theory, namely, to request, demand that my theory receives a 1 megabyte space on the Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository hard drive..:) NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK…:)

I’ve fulfilled all the requirements to post the theory there… (already peer-reviewed, published work that has been endorsed)…:)

Double-click the Bird below to find out more..>:)

I would welcome anyone to take the initiative to publish my paper on the Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives.

The pdf is here. This is a shorter version of the theory. Just below 1 megabyte length. It was accepted and endorsed the last time I attempted posting it there.

As I mentioned, I would be eternally grateful to anyone (My Giordano Bruno) that would bring this work to a wider audience through posting it at the Arxives or through forwarding this blog link or the pdfs to other people…

Considering that this theory provides a new paradigm for Coherent Nuclear Fusion, the planet you might save might be yours…:)

Feynman wouldn’t blink in face of this challenge…:)

The current version of the work is here.

I know that if you do so, Paul Ginsparg might place you on his blacklist. I know that I am not a professional scientist any longer..:) I know it all….

I also know the VALUE OF IDEAS and that they are worth fighting for. I don’t expect any thing less from a scientist (professional or not)…

Just think, “What would Richard P. Feynman do????”

Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars – mere globs of gas atoms. I, too, can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? Richard P. Feynman

Don’t make me explain analogies:

Poets – String Theorist, Supersymmetrists…Gauge Physicists…:)
the Beauty of the Stars – The Beauty of Weyl Fermions, Higgs, Bosons, Dirac Matrices, etc…
Mere globs of gas atoms – My humble and simple theory
Feynman – The little me…

Cheers,

PS- Since the first release of this blog, I had the opportunity to discuss my theory with Craig Markwardt from JPL. I will present the discussion in its interity soon.

I wonder if my friends from the Laser Laboratory at UofR or at the Fermi Lab are reading the changes in paradigm for nuclear fusion….:) I once told Professor Huizenga while attending a party at his house, that I knew how to make a Gamma Ray laser… He looked very surprised and most likely somewhat amused..>:)

I am sure that in his mind briefly passed those concerns about the problems pumping an ultrafast decaying nuclear transition, etc… As usual, people can only think within the paradigms they lived by…I wasn’t able to create any interest in that brief interaction…:)

I told the same thing to Gary Holton many years ago… Life is full of hits and misses…As usual , I would love to hear from my friends at UPenn, Princeton, Berkeley, UofChicago..>:) CERN, Steven Hawking comes to mind, the 5Dimension Centre, USAF, Whiteman Airforce Base, The Institute for Advanced Studies, well, the Devil Himself (I mean, Paul Ginsparg)…..>:)

Comments (0)

August 6, 2009

Hunger

Filed under: Hunger — admin @ 7:23 pm

Hunger

Life is challenging. Every so often one feels the need for a pick me up…:) Some people play the Lottery…:) I hate to lose money so I try not… but it is Human Nature…

When all the stars dim out in the sky – paraphrasing the last chapter of the Lord of The Rings…:)
when all hope is gone… some giant Eagles will come to rescue…:)

I felt like that not too long ago and reached out to a Fortune Cookie just to get this one…:)

Of course, I read my fortune on those fortune cookies…:) and totally believe that everything happens for no reason whatsoever… at least the events of chance – without direct causal linkages…

I felt silly … made fun by a cookie…:)

Eventually I found reasons to be hopeful.

A student from University of Illinois sent me this nice email asking me questions. Since I know the horror of censorship by the establishment I will ellipse his/her name. I always try to do no harm… the first rule of hypercivilisation.. The second is to try to help.

This is another example of student engagement that makes me very hopeful someday people will fully understand my simple theory.

Dear MP,

I am a Physics undergraduate at the University of Illinois at Chicago and am about to finish up my Bachelor’s in Science. The current models just don’t cut it for me and so I am always looking for a new, more intuitive explanation for our observed phenomena. So when i came across your blog, i was very excited and intrigued. I have downloaded your latest paper and am slowly working through it, though i have hit a conceptual roadblock. I can not get my head around your concept of the fundamental dilator.

I can see it as a this perturbation that tunnels between two finite potential wells.

But the notation regarding spin is confusing me (the notation in Figure 4 in your paper titled “The Hypergeometrical Universe”). What exactly are these spins?
also, and i guess more fundamentally, what do you mean by “I modeled “particles” as coherences between 4D stationary states of metric
deformation.” Namely, what is this coherence you bring up repeatedly?

Lastly, I was wondering if you are free within the next few months (as i am on summer break) to meet in person and talk to me about your model? I am in Chicago but am willing to travel to meet with you.

Thank you for you time and contributions to the field.

Best,
–

Name withheld by MP…:)

Well, how not to be hopeful with the future of Mankind when one faces the intellectually curious youth.

I will reproduce my quickly jotted down answer and try to fill in the blanks that I might had missed in my first attempt.

Sorry taking so long to reply. I rarely reads this email. Please use comments or send me email to ny2292000@yahoo.com.

I am preparing myself to go to work so I will be brief here. If you be so kind, I will use your question in the blog such that everyone can learn.

I certainly believe that my theory provides a better framework for describing the Universe than the rest. I would be happy to meet you in NYC or if you could arrange a little student gathering in Chicago, I would be happy to provide a brief talk about the theory.

Figure 4 contains the rotating double potential well associated with the fundamental dilator coherences. The fundamental dilator coherence is a coherence between two metric deformational states. This theory seeks how much one can say without defining details and what can be learn from that. This simple picture does not provide you with any information about the potential wells themselves but provides a picture that can be mapped to particles.

The spinning corresponds to a rotation on a four dimensional Cartesian manifold where the dilator not only spins (rotates around axes perpendicular to R (R is perpendicular to the Fabric of Space or our 3D lightspeed traveling hyperspherical shockwave universe). The dimensions associated with each state corresponds to metric deformation axes. I envision the dilator as a shape-shifting spinning hyper-ellipsoid of revolution. It has three axes as opposed to two axis in the standard ellipsoid of revolution.

The axis corresponds of a change in distance felt by two points on radially opposing directions to the ellipsoid.

The spin half which always bothered me as a graduate student is a relationship between spinning and tunneling.

If one considers the fourth axis to be very thin or Nil, the overlap of this ellipsoid is only not null when the dilator finite axes are flush against the fabric of space. This creates the stroboscopic Universe and preserves the character of our fundamental particles (electron, proton, positron, antiproton). They are just different phases of this coherence.

In summary, the intrinsic rotation (spin) is made extrinsic ( an actual rotation) in my theory.

By the way, I have a great friend at the University of Illinois. He works at the Supercomputer Center.

Please feel free to ask any questions, propose problems and just criticize the theory. I will defend it as I can.

I placed the theory on the web because I wasn’t able to receive any meaningful criticism other that INAPPROPRIATE (see the censorship of my theory sister blog).

I believe the theory will percolate the community in the next few years. It takes time for people to understand something new. By the way, the spinning creates the stroboscopic universe and also solves the problem of how to abridge the gap between classical and quantum mechanics.

I explained already how to do it, but I didn’t apply the theory to a hydrogen atom. I used the Quantum Lagrangian Principle to derive the forces.

Cheers,

Figure 4 is shown below:

There are a few salient aspects in this diagram. The first is that I maintained a notation that parallels the Quark composition of particles in the Standard Model. They have a different meaning and serve a different purpose. In the Standard Model, they correspond to quarks up and down (2/3, 1/3 respectively). In my case, they correspond to the axis lengths of a hyperellipsoid of revolution (an ellipsoid of revolution with three axis as opposed to two).

I chose an hyperellipsoid but I could equally well had chosen a hyper parallelepiped…:) What matter is that it has three axes and thus defines a volume. In my case, it is a displacement volume. A displacement volume is the volume that disappears or appears as the dilator tunnels from state to state.

If one conceive the four dimensional Cartesian space where our hyperspherical expanding 3D Universe exists as an elastic medium, then the tunneling by the dilator generates waves on a pristine space. Pristine is only the outwards of the hyperspherical Universe. The inwards (corresponding to the region inside the Hypersphere) is not pristine and is full of dilatons but no dilator. All dilators travel at the speed of light with the shockwave Universe.

In the email, I was asked about what spins

Figure 4 contains the rotating double potential well associated with the fundamental dilator coherences. The fundamental dilator coherence is a coherence between two metric deformational states. This theory seeks how much one can say without defining details and what can be learn from that. This simple picture does not provide you with any information about the potential wells themselves but provides a picture that can be mapped to particles.

The spinning corresponds to a rotation on a four dimensional Cartesian manifold where the dilator not only spins (rotates around axes perpendicular to R (R is perpendicular to the Fabric of Space or our 3D lightspeed traveling hyperspherical shockwave universe). The dimensions associated with each state corresponds to metric deformation axes. I envision the dilator as a shape-shifting spinning hyper-ellipsoid of revolution. It has three axes as opposed to two axis in the standard ellipsoid of revolution.

The axis corresponds of a change in distance felt by two points on radially opposing directions to the ellipsoid.

The spin half which always bothered me as a graduate student is a relationship between spinning and tunneling.

If one considers the four axis to be very thin or Nil, the overlap of this ellipsoid is only not null when it is flush against the fabric of space. This creates the stroboscopic Universe and preserves the character of our fundamental particles (electron, proton, positron, antiproton). They are just phases of this coherences.

In summary, the intrinsic rotation (spin) is made extrinsic ( an actual rotation) in my theory.

One has to wrap one’s minds around a shape shifting object, translating at the speed of light that also spins. In doing so, its overlap with our 3D Universe – also translating at the speed of light- changes from “Zero” to a volume that corresponds to a proton or an electron or an antiproton or a positron.

Note that there is intrinsically a tempo for all those transaction. If they were to happen out of phase the resulting interaction would be null. Thus one can envision the quantization of spin as real or the result of observation. Anything without that quantization wouldn’t be detected in our Universe.
My position is that the quantization happened at time zero – when the initial bipolar macroscopic metric deformation decayed into the matter with which we are familiar.

I wasn’t able to make a good figure or to make some animation. It would be great.

The best I could come up with was the Fundamental Dilator shown in this figure.

The colors indicate dilation or contraction of the local metric, the lettering orientation indicates the orientation of the dilator phase largest cross-section with respect to the 3D Universe. Horizontal lettering means total overlap with the 3D Universe. Perpendicular lettering results in zero overlap with the 3D Universe, thus those phases are not detected, but they produce a dilaton field (metric waves) since their contributions add coherently to the contributions of prior phases. Remember that even though I draw this phases along an horizontal line, they are occurring along the radial direction. The radial direction is perpendicular to the 3D Universe.

I mentioned in my theory that it provides the link between Classical and Quantum Mechanics. I used this link to calculate from first principles all the forces.

I did not use it to model the Hydrogen Atom for instance. I was hopping someone would ask me that simple question and I would advise them on how to do it. Time has passed by and I will be tackling this problem soon. Of course, I welcome help.

The last question is about what is the meaning of modeling particles as coherences between deformational states.

Well, let pick up a few examples. The electron and antielectron shown in the fundamental dilator diagram corresponds to the eternally (almost) repeating coherence show in the double potential well diagram. Depending upon which phase is in phase with the 3D Universe, one would observe one or the other particle. Observation is the result of stroboscopic interaction.

If you study Fourier series you know that overlapping sinusoidals only yield a non-zero integral if there is a frequency relationship between them. They should have the same underlying frequency to yield a non-zero integral Here we have the same problem, when two particles interact they change shape and thus attraction (repulsion). If in one phase they attract each other and in the other they repel each other, the resulting interaction is null. This would be the case of a Neutron. A neutrino has a different frequency component. The neutrino coherence is not between the ground states of the double potential well, but between the excited states of the double potential well.

Let’s pick up another example:

This pion plus coherence repeats itself until it decays into an positron and a gamma ray. The gamma ray is the result of the decay of the electron-positron subcoherences.

The pion is actually a trimmer. Within the 3D space it will always look as structured to to its three components. There is a degeneracy on which phase is in phase with the 3D Universe. The three states coexist and provide an extra degree of freedom (orbital angular momentum or helicity).

Particles are derived form the Fundamental Dilator since most of the matter in the Universe is made of it and the particles interact with the Universe, thus they should contain its fundamental component.

Thanks for giving me hope…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

July 28, 2009

The Meaning of Material Existence

Filed under: The Meaning of Material Existence — admin @ 8:04 am

The Meaning of Material Existence

If you are a curious reader you might had noticed that this is a rerun – that is, I decided that since I am extremely busy to post prior postings for people to read the blog at leasure pace.

When I wrote this posting, I was struggling with the single-sideness of the coherence. At this point, I was considering that the dilator would be exiting the 3D manifold because the double potential well had a center of mass around our 3D space and by rotating, the dilator phase would go into and out of our 3D space. This paradigm was later replaced by a more coherence perspective where the stroboscopic nature of Nature is assigned to a different thickness along the Radial direction (thin along that direction). This means that the disappearance act is due to a change in 3D volume overlap..:)

The information is always here but it takes time to scroll 1000 pages and find what you want. Since I wrote about the meaning of material existence and proposed the intermitence of existence, I was able to better characterize how our existences were flashing before our eyes..:)

The paradigm of a Maser or a Double Well is fine but a refinement is to consider that matter is made of dilators which rotate in a four dimensional spatial manifold. Since we live in the lightspeed expanding 3D hyperspherical Universe, the rotation makes the dilator’s footprint to change in size – disappearing for all but two phases within the spin cycle.

The intermitent existence comes from “I interact therefore I exist” paradigm. Particles that exist in frequencies different from that of the Fundamental Dilator do not interact and are considered to have zero mass, zero charge etc. Of course, under collisions that averaging does not necessarily goes to zero. If one makes the collisional time to be short them it is possible to detect them…;) Neutrinos are examples of those particles.

For the curious reader, the Fundamental Dilator Paradigm will be reviewed soon but you can just look into the side panel and find them…:)

———————————–

I believe that the simplest picture for matter is one of a coherence within a lightspeed radially traveling four-dimensional “rotating double potential well”… Again, I am driven by physical considerations…
The Nitrogen atom in the Maser have existence in one side of the hydrogen plane and disappears from existence in that side of the hydrogen plane with an oscillating frequency equal to the difference in energy between these two states divided by h (Planck constant). This is a coherence, that is, the real state is a linear combination of two states of different energies (frequencies). The difference in energy is what creates the beating.

Figure 1. This figure shows a double potential well representing the energy levels of an out-of-plane vibration of Nitrogen in Ammonia. The space dimension is the distance from the Hydrogen Plane. This Figure was borrowed from the internet and its availability is greatly acknowledged and thanked for.

In the case of Ammonia, the finite potential barrier in the middle allows for tunneling and that in itself results in a splitting of equal energy levels located on both potential wells. The difference in energy between these new hybrid levels will define the frequency of beating. In the case of Ammonia, the potential wells are symmetric and the beating frequency is in the microwave region. The probability of the Nitrogen being found in one side of the Hydrogen plane is equal to the probability of the Nitrogen to be found in the other side of the plane.

In the case of an “Existing Particle” – material existence of a particle will be explored later in this work – it can be thought as a coherence between a massive and a massless states of the multidimensional space. The massless state lies outside the 3-D space along the radial direction. Their nature is of an eigenstate of spatial deformation (4-D space) potential rotating double well.

The mass of different particles /state of space deformation is defined by the different probabilities of being found in the massive side of the potential well. That explains the large variety of particle masses.

ParticleMass is a 3-D footprint (in the 3-D Universe we know) while they walk and tumble along the radial direction.

This in a nutshell is the reason why different particles have different rest masses.

You have to remember that in the theory particles always rotate (tumble) around the direction perpendicular to the plane XR (YR, ZR)..Those tumblings correspond to the Pauli spin (sigmax, sigmay, sigmaz)…Other quantum numbers can be obtained using similar reasoning…

The meaning of Material Existence implies that as the molecule tumbles it should set foot on the 3-D space at multiples of the de Broglie wavelength… At this time, I am not explaining some other details of the meaning of Mass… It is an elaborate argument…I will explain later..

Basically, to exist is to set foot on the Hyperspherical Universe Shock Wave every so often… If the phase is not correct, things don’t exist…

To exist is to be phase-matched with the Hyperspherical Shock-Wave Universe.
That is also the basic condition for Nuclear Chemistry.

The potential well is not symmetric (the radial direction and the 3-D shell are not symmetric)… thus the occupation number on each side of the well are not equal….That is the reason for the different masses associated with different particles… just an occupation number on a “rotating four-dimensional asymmetric “double” well” … I say “double” because one of the sides is triply degenerated (3-D side or Universe side)…

A simple problem…

PS- The maximum potential mass of a particle is proportional to the absolute value of its charge…:) Hadrons have three dimensional footprints in the 3-D Universe we know.. Mesons have two dimensional footprints…

From that you can imagine that the maximum mass of an electron is equal to the maximum mass of a proton and that is pretty close to the mass of a neutron…:)

I will introduce the HyperGeometrical Universe Standard Model next. I skipped the derivation of the Biot-Savart Law because it is convoluted to explain in a blog…but it is in the papers

I am not covering the Cosmogenesis because it is too simple… albeit conceptually straining..:) I might explain if there is interest…

I hope you are happy to understand the Meaning of Material Existence. Please feel free to ask any questions.

Cheers,

Comments (1)

July 22, 2009

Gravitation 101

Filed under: Gravitation 101 — admin @ 7:56 am

Gravitation 101 and the Holy Grail of Physics

First things first… You have been a resilient reader and have been seen the trademark HyperGeometrical Universe Expanding Hyperspherical picture above time after time… It is about time for me to explain the exact meaning of each line.

The first thing you notice is a green circle – this is the cross-section of what we know as our 3-D Universe. X is any direction. Notice that the model defines that the radius of curvature is equal to the dimensional age of the Universe (c – lightspeed times the age of the Universe – circa 15 billion years). The exact age of the Universe was calculated in another blog using the Pioneer Anomaly as an experimental results.

Also notice that even though the curvature is defined by the motion along the fourth-coordinate, this is not the curvature that is referred to in General Relativity. That curvature is measure between the 3-D Universe and PROPER TIME. That curvature is influence by velocity and mass here and in the General Relativity.

The curvature depicted in the Hypergeometrical Universe ICON is measured between the 3-D Universe and the ABSOLUTE TIME or the RADIAL DIRECTION.

The curvature in the figure relates to the Hubble expansion process. Simple geometric considerations indicate that the average receding speed between two points of the Universe is c*Fi , where Fi is the Cosmological Angle. For a π radian angle (opposing points in the shock wave Universe) would result in a receding velocity of π*c. Notice that Universe expansion in this model does not requires any Dark Energy or Antigravitational Force although we do have Antigravitation in it. Antigravity will be covered in the HyperGeometrical Universe Standard Model.

The receding speed for two points separated by one radian is c, that is, at one radian the average Hubble speed will be c and any radiation from that region will appear in the microwave region due to Doppler effect. This means also that one can never reach any point after one radian from where you are, the further you travel, the further the one radian point recedes. One can never observe any event that is moving away from you faster than the speed of light, one cannot see any point further from you by one Cosmological Radian.

The initial space fluctuation was a little Hypersphere prior to breaking apart into all the particles of the Universe. Due to symmetry (perfect Hypersphere), the initial decomposition occurred in all places of the Universe. This means that wherever you are is where the Big Bang occurred. It also means that if you look far away (with a telescope), you will see the beginning of times or thereabouts. I will digress about the meaning of time later. These inital fluctuations will be covered in the Hypergeometrical Universe Cosmogenesis.

The second fine point in the figure above are the time projections:
1. Radial Time (Absolute)
2. Dimensional Time τ (Relative)
3. Cosmological Absolute Time Φ

Follow the Yellow Brick Road to learn about time projections and a simple way of thinking in five dimensions. You will also learn why τ is called Dimensional Time when it is clearly a direction in the Four-Dimensional space. If you didn’t go to the Yellow Brick Road, I will like to tell you that along that direction lies actually two directions (one direction and one projection) because linear motion is equivalent to two rotations. One around the axis perpendiculat to XΦ and another around the axis perpendicular to XR. One angle is imaginary and the other is real, respectively.

Now it starts to become clear that the motion of the particle is actually in a five dimensional space (four physical dimensions and a time) and at the speed of light, being the three dimension motion just a drift. If you need to review supporting arguments about the last statement click here.

Rotations imaginary or otherwise will reproduce nice relationships between waves. The imaginary angle rotation will produce Relativity, since it is a Lorentz transform. Here the directions are proper time and X.

The real angle rotation will reproduce a nice visual relationship between the wave decomposition components (τ Direction propagating wave and the X direction propagating wave).

Now that you know what the figure means, you can see the Holy Grail of Physics (of course, if this is correct – you have my word on it… after all, I’ve never lied to you before …:)

I couldn’t resist and reproduced the Grand Unification Equation below…
The total waveform is given by:

The Gradient of this waveform should be set to zero and the closest maxima to each particle found. Notice that there is a k-vector in the equation. The k-vector has to be modified for particles in motion (magnetism from DC currents and electromagnetism from AC-currents). The modification is the appropriate Lorentz transformation and it is how I derived the Biot-Savart equation. The derivation will be presented later.

This equation shows a body with N dilators (X Particles) interacting with another with just one.

Notice that the first has a cosine on the denominator while the other doesn’t. The reason for that is the usage of a “Short Wavelength Approximation”. The large mass wave contribution is thought to have a small wavelength, thus the cosine oscillation is extremely fast. This means that maxima due to that contribution are bound to be extremely closely together. The oscillatory cosine is approximated by a constant.

Notice that there is a P factor that relates to the dimensionality of the decay. Notice that the “field” equations are two dimensional (cross-sections) and that the decay happens in terms of the increasing circular perimeter. The perimeter increases in terms of the number of spatial dimensions (3) plus spin*(fourth-dimension). For example, for a particle of spin half P would be 3.5. For a particle of spin zero (neutral matter) P would be 3.

It is slight complicated to understand that a body (collection of dilators) is perfectly lined up with the space in which it is embedded.

THE HOLY GRAIL OF PHYSICS

This work makes a huge claim: to be the source of the Holy Grail of Physics.

It is or maybe it isn’t the Grand Unification Theory. This model changes paradigm to do so, based on a solid argument of an expanding 4-Dimensional Hyperspherical Shock-Wave Universe.

This is, of course, unexpected and to some degree some might argue that it has a lower level of sophistication (mathematical sophistication). The theory, on the other hand, is laden with physical insight guiding each and every hypotheses and simplifications.

This theory was created during a period of six months, while riding the subway in New York City during my commuting. It was never intended to be complete and to rewrite all physics. It was meant to be just my opinion and something for people to build upon.

It turned out that Holy Grail is a very appropriate description of any work in this area. I bothered to review the Science Status Quo throughout my life. After my initial insight, it became clear to me that these ideas should be investigated further and that drove my subsequent efforts in communicating them.

Raiders of the Lost Ark

In the Raiders of the Lost Ark, people also find the Holy Grail and discover that just its sight is enough to explode their Brains while melting face, eyeballs etc…:) A really horrendous sight..:)

It turned out that this is a good explanation why I cannot find feedback on this theory. Anyone who has any competing ideas, will peddle theirs and never read anything else seriously. The simple sight of a competitor’s theory would be enough to make one’s thoughts impure and thus make their theory fraudulent to some degree. I don’t think that this is the case, myself. I believe many of us were able to create half-baked ideas and those half-baked ideas could be great contributions if they were the subject of strong intellectual scrutiny. By defending one’s ideas, one make them more solid (better baked).

I believe that this is the explanation for the lack of any serious scrutiny, which would be welcome…

Of course, I speak a different language, but the basic claim of this model should scream OBVIOUSLY CORRECT or OBVIOUSLY INCORRECT… One cannot have an indifferent position about an Universe flying at the speed of light…:)

This is a departure from anything that is SANE IN SCIENCE (although I believe it is the correct paradigm.:).

Come to the Light and let me know your thoughts. I place a CONTACTME button on purpose to get any one of your opinions…:) Preferably knowledgeable opinions, but I will be glad to see anything relevant on my mailbox…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

July 21, 2009

May the Force be with You, Not

Filed under: May the Force be with You, Not — admin @ 6:50 pm

May The Force be With You, Not

In this posting, I discuss the irrelevance of the Force concept. In fact, when Newton decided to express his second law in terms of Force, Mass and acceleration, he missed the opportunity to create the purely geometrical theory – The Hypergeometrical Universe

This is the most important installment of the theory. You have been told that you are strong, can pull up big weights, big biceps etc… Luke Skywalker was told that the Force should be with him….etc…

The only thing I can tell you is to Forget The Force…. It will not do anything to help you with The Grand Unification… By the way, Forget The Field… It doesn’t help either… at least at this stage… Later, you can come back and redefine everything in your own words….

Now that you forgot, Force… Forget Mass… Forget Charge… One cannot Unify anything with those constructs…

Now, think about what is the goal of mechanics (Gravitation), electrostatics, electromagnetism… The goal is to explain why things move by action at distance…:)

The HU Theory describes the Universe as a Four-Dimensional Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Surface. You might imagine what I was thinking… Dilatons are spacewaves… What waves do?… During my thoughts, I remembered the tropical storms that stranded me in the room in the backward of my childhood home… Mini lakes separated me from the main house and there was nothing to do other than to look at the hypnotical waves …

Many years passed by and I had to face waves again…This time they were four-dimensional and my little pond was actually the whole Universe hurling through the four-dimensional space at the speed of light… (four-dimensional space equal five-dimensional spacetime).

The first challenge is what property or symmetry to pay attention?…. The second problem is how to think in four-dimensions, that is, how to simplify the problem such as to be able to fit inside my Brain…

The solution to the first problem are Lorentz transforms… The solution to the second problem is the usage of cross-sections… The Solution to the third problem is 42 or the Pendulum of Brahma…

The Pendulum of Brahma is an allegory that states that the Pendulum swings and every time is passes again, it is at a different place (different four-dimensional spacetime coordinate in Relativity or different fifth-dimensional spacetime coordinate in HU). The Universe is never the same, it moves forward every time the Pendulum of Brahma Passes By.

de Broglie proposed that matter has an equivalent wavelength (de Broglie wavelength) that identifies the equivalent wave in the particle-wave duality. The Pendulum of Brahma corresponds to each de Broglie wavelength expansion of the whole Universe. This will become clearer later…

The theory does not need the definition of Mass, Charge etc.. to predict action at distance. It needs those definitions for calibration with what we know.

Let’s start with the easy “Force”, Gravitation. – to be continued tomorrow…:)

Comments (0)

July 18, 2009

Hope Springs Eternal

Filed under: Hope Springs Eternal — admin @ 5:14 pm

Hope Springs Eternal

When I decided to blog this theory, I hoped that it would generate enough interest and bring more scrutiny to it. While creating it, I tried to get people to read it without success.

I am not from this field and learned that outsiders are outcasts in any situation. This theory was created by an outsider and I believe that is why it is so different, creative and probably correct…:)

Many people following the same idea, repeating the same Mantras, Higgs Bosons, Conjecture This etc… will never be able to think outside that vocabulary.

It has been said, that the theory of everything would require a new vocabulary, meaning a new set of mathematical constructs, new theorems etc…

It was never said, the theory of everything would require a fresh perspective…:) Before scalating complexities for complexity sake, one should see if one can find simplifying assumptions. I looked around and found a few.

Well, let’s not be too involved with one’s own ideas and restate this as, there should be a place in the literature for ideas which are not the one’s which are the mainstream, giving that they have a rational support. I believe my ideas fall into that category.

“Can’t we all get along???? (hypergeometricists, string theorists, conjecturists…:)

I failed to get through their spam-killer software last time I tried to contact the leaders in this field (positive thinking).

I decided to take a new try now that the theory is nicely presented in a blog…:) and I will be contact a few scientists in hopes to make the theory more widely available…:)

In the next few blogs I will make public the results of my efforts.

Hope Springs Eternal..:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

July 16, 2009

Why do things move?

Filed under: Why do things move? — admin @ 7:34 pm

Why do things move?

Mostly likely you never asked yourself this question? In fact this is actually two questions:

Why things move when they are subjected to a force?
Why they keep moving afterwards (after the force is not in place any longer)?

The answer to the first question is due to the fact that constraint forces do no do any work. They are perpendicular to motion and thus cannot do work even if they wanted..:) They are not lazy…:)

The theories before mine were built on the base of Classical Mechanics and use Lagrangians and minimization principles. Those principles have built-in concepts of Potentials, momentum, mass etc… Using them one could not create my theory. The reason being is that one has to go one step below. One has to use the reasoning of lazy constraining forces not doing any work and avoid introducing the concept of force.

Instead of thinking about Force, I thought about de Broglie (or Compton if you so prefer) stepwise hyperspherical expansion of the 4-Dimensional Universe Shock Wave. Minimization of the contraint forces means in this perspective having the dilators to be in phase with surrounding dilations caused by other dilators. Notice that this means that all dilators are in phase with each other dilations at each swing of the Pendulum of Bhrama or de Broglie step.

This in sync stepwise motion is the source of Quantum Mechanics and allows for the addition of wave amplitudes as opposed to their squares. I call this a Cosmological Coherence. It is the reason why radiation (spacetime dilatons) generated from each and every atom of your body to add up to form an extensive property, that is, the field amplitude is proportional to the number of dilators.

This simplifies the theory and makes it a simple theory of everything.

Now returning to the problem of why things move (inertially). Inertia can be thought as the resistence spacetime generates when subject to deformation. The space has a spring constant (which I used to calculate the natural frequency of spacetime waves or gravitational waves and the number is 42!!!!)….. Just kidding…but it is not that far from 42…:)

Thinking along those lines, a body that is traveling has all its dilators siting on a shock wave that has a local distortion. This figure shows that local deformation of the spacetime as arrow 1, which is not perpendicular to the hyperspherical shell any longer. Motion happens as the hyperspherical Universe expands. Notice that moving from the situation 1 to the situation 3 resulted in the elimination of spacetime stress. The k-vector on situation 3 is perpendicular to the hyperspherical shell and will move away from the original point with the same velocity as always, its Hubble velocity…:) albeit remained fixed onto the Fabric of Space…:)

That space distortion will travel to the point in the Universe where the distortion is relaxed. When it reaches that point it will stop and site onto the relaxed Fabric of Space. Surprisingly, due to the expansional character of the Shock Wave Universe, it will be seem as moving at constant speed (its local Hubble speed) forever.

This is the reason for motion and this is the logical complement to Newton’s First Law!

Next, I will explain why things move when subjected to a “Force”.

Cheers,

Comments (0)

July 14, 2009

SuperStrings

Filed under: SuperStrings — admin @ 8:17 pm

SuperStrings

First I have to say that the research in SuperStrings or any other tremendously mathematical theory is valuable and has been set forth by brilliant minds. In addition, the theories might really being brought back from the 23rd Century and be totally correct.

Secondly, I have to say something that might help you see other perspectives with an open mind.

Here is what I have to say:

There is a bothering aspect in the present search for the theory of everything.
There are precepts on how the theory should look like.

Unseeming comments like the claim that String Theory is a theory from the 23rd Century (thus should be correct) are not scientific. It delegates all other
attempts to second best just by using that empty statement.

I see the big picture although I might fail to see the details. The big picture is that superstrings are supposed to replicate energy levels (mass) of particles and the different types of bosons that convey the so called Forces. The problem is that SuperSring boundary conditions create evenly spaced energy levels (the length of the string is a multiple of the wavelength associated with an specific state). All the contortions of creation of Tori, folding the space in membranes etc are used to try to compresses those strings into submission to yield the observed particles and bosons.

The fact that the superstring is supposed to be extremely small means that there will be a lot of trouble to make matter out of them (to find states that are low enough to accommodate the observed particles’ masses).

The fact that the strings are floppy also means that they do not have nice moments of inertia and thus are not good to be modeled for quantized rotational energy levels. In my theory, I used the rotations to replicate the intrinsic quantized quantum numbers. Superstring, Kaluza-Klein theories use compact curved spaces to replicate the same property. That results in dimensional inflation, that is, the inflation in required the number of dimensions. I believe that it is more likely the existence of a soliton that has a well defined moment of inertia tensor embedded in a simpler space than to have a utterly complicated space membrane that sometimes foams..>:)

I think it is too much work for a simple string. In this theory, I divided the problem into many:

First, find out how many forces are out there… I found only one “force” that reproduces Gravitation and Electromagnetism. Light speed expanding Universe means that E=mc^2 is kinetic in origin, thus there shouldn’t be any potential energy stored.
I proposed a particle X (four-dimensional ellipsoid of revolution) that can provide all the structure associated with experimental nuclear scattering.
Particle X axes are modeled after the Quark Composition of matter and thus provide anisotropic collisional cross-sections.
The dilatons decay in a quantized manner as a function of the number of waves and not spatial distance. This is certainly new. Asymptotic freedom or spherical symmetric collisions are recovered if one managed to get the particles close enough (high energy collisions).
Another problem to be solved is the nature of the solitonic state of these four-dimensional dilators (X Particles). For this, I believe it is just necessary to create a simple potential for space deformation and derive the dilator states (particles masses).
Another problem that HU Models solves is the explanation for the intrinsic quantum states. Charm, Spin etc are modeled as rotations (tumbling) of these four-dimensional dilators.
Weak force is modeled as a Relativistic Hadronic Nonlinear Wave Scattering problem and it naturally lead to hadronic lasers.
Next to last, I have to mention that this is a first viewing (nobody wanted to read it) of this theory and thus it is in the same level (perhaps better) than the first research papers on Quantum Mechanics, when people were discussing if Schrodinger equation should be linear or non-linear, etc. I am proposing a framework with well defined hypotheses and some initial results (Grand Unification). I don’t have access to particle physics data and thus there is work left to be done all over the place. This means that if you are interested and have the appropriate background, I would certainly welcome collaborators.

Last but not least, the theory not only proposes that the Universe is traveling at the speed of light but tells you that you are composed of four-dimensional particles (tumbling 5-D spacetime solitons). I tell you, this has to be a difficult pill to swallow…:)

Cheers,

Comments (0)

Older Posts »